Sunday, August 14, 2005

Fw: what we have become

 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2005 7:57 PM
Subject: what we have become

From the National Catholic Reporter.  There are no words.
 
Kim
 
The Passion of Dilawar of Yakubi

By DAVID TOWNSEND

Watching Mel Gibson’s “The Passion of the Christ,” you wonder if this 
is
really what Jesus of Nazareth suffered. Here on film an actor  affects
pain,
agony and a brutal death by crucifixion. It does not  seem that anyone
could
suffer so much. It does not seem that the barbaric sadism of the Roman
interrogators and prison guards could be surpassed. It does not seem
that
the human heart could deliver such cruelty. Surely a Christian would
not do
so.

And yet now comes the passion of Dilawar of Yakubi, a man like Jesus
of Nazareth, innocent, and supposed by his interrogators to be
innocent. Yet unlike Jesus of Nazareth, Dilawar of Yakubi was
executed by crucifixion without the benefit of even a trial in the
Sanhedrin or an audience with the local procurator, Gen. Daniel K.
McNeill. Unlike Pontius Pilate, Gen. McNeill denied what his
subordinates and we Americans do. “We are not chaining people to the
ceilings,” he lied on Feb. 7, 2003.

Two months before this lie, just before Christmas 2002, Dilawar of
Yuakubi, a small village in Afghanistan not unlike Nazareth in
Palestine where Jesus grew up, died by crucifixion. Dilawar of Yakubi
was chained to the ceiling of his cell, suspended there for three
days compared to Jesus of Nazareth’s three hours. His arms dislocated
from their sockets. They flapped like a bird’s broken wings when he
was taken down for interrogation, as Jesus’ arms may have done had he
been taken down from the cross before three hours.

While he was chained to the ceiling, Dilawar of Yakubi’s legs were
beaten to a pulp. “Pulpified” is the coroner’s description. “I’ve
seen similar injuries in an individual run over by a bus,” reports
coroner Lt. Col. Elizabeth Rouse.

In Mel Gibson’s portrayal, Jesus was a marvelously healthy specimen,
muscular, unblemished and beautiful to behold. He stood about 6 feet
2 inches at about 195 pounds. Dilawar of Yakubi was a frail 122
pounds standing at 5 feet 9 inches. His hands died first. When
brought in for interrogation, his arms waved about, a common effect
of crucifixion. Dilawar of Yakubi could neither stand nor sit, his
legs now pulpified. By all accounts, Jesus of Nazareth’s legs were
not broken until after he died.

By all accounts, Jesus of Nazareth cried out upon death in a loud 
voice.
Dilawar of Yakubi cried out, “Allah! Allah! Allah!” repeatedly during
the
final 24 hours of his crucifixion.

The guards hearing Jesus of Nazareth scream out “Eli, Eli,” supposed 
he was
calling for Elias, not clearly understanding his native  tongue. They
decided to see if Elias would come to rescue him and took sadistic
delight
that Elias did not come to save him. Similarly, American guards
returned
often during the final 24 hours of Dilawar of Yakubi’s crucifixion to
beat
his dangling legs with pulpifying blows. “I would think it was about
100
strikes,” said the First  Platoon’s Specialist Corey E. Jones.
“Everybody
heard him cry out and thought it was funny.”

“Allah! Allah! Allah!” cried out Dilawar of Yakubi and gave up his
spirit.

There is nothing else to say in this Year of Our Lord 2005 except his
blood is on our hands and on the hands of our children. He was a
poor, innocent taxi driver in a remote place. The three customers he
had picked up for that fatal fare were released after 15 months of
interrogation at Guantánamo as “posing no threat.”

Oh, and one more thing: 22-year-old Dilawar of Yakubi, unlike 33-year-
old Jesus of Nazareth, leaves behind a daughter, Bibi Rashida, age 3.
You can look at the picture of this beautiful girl on Page A13 of The
New York Times for May 20. You might want to put it on your wall, as
I did, next to your crucifix.

David Townsend is a tutor at St. John’s College in Annapolis, Md.,
and senior adviser for seminars at the Aspen Institute.



National Catholic Reporter, August 12, 2005


 
 

King and Subject by Carol Wolman

King and Subject by Carol Wolman

The drama of King George and Cindy is now a week old.  Cindy Sheehan is patiently waiting for an audience with the ruler who sent her son to be killed in an unjust, illegal war.  Bush, in his arrogance, does not feel that he has to meet with her, and has not.  She sits in the hot Texas sun as his motorcade passes by, and asks why the donors of money are more important than she, who donated her son to his cruel cause.

The servile press mocks her and defends the king.  The courtiers accuse her of "undermining troop morale".  Local rednecks shoot at Camp Casey, named for her son, who died in Al Sadr two years ago.

And supporters flock from all over the world, to join her vigil.  The internet buzzes with Cindy's courage and George's cowardice.  She is galvanizing the peace movement.

Cindy is Catholic, and believes that all people are created equal, and that God values us all.  She does not think that Bush is so lofty that he does not have not meet with her face to face and answer her questions. With Mary, she has faith that

Luke:   52God hath put down the mighty from their seats, and exalted them of low degree.

And indeed, Cindy is being called "the Rosa Parks of the peace movement".  Her passion may fire us all enough, to impeach the mighty and kick them out of office. 

You can help Cindy Sheehan build the impeachment movement by printing out the letter to Conyers at http://deependnews.com/memorandum.htm  This is a self-propagating petition. Anyone can collect 15 signatures of American citizens- they don't have to be registered to vote, or even 18.  Many of your signers will want a blank one, so that they can do what you are doing, and so the impeachment movement will grow.

This letter is not what people signed on line- that was Conyers' letter to Bush.  This petition is an expression of the people's desire that Conyers formally request impeachment hearings. It is faxed directly to his office and puts no one at risk. 

Power to "We, the People!"

In the name of the Prince of Peace,  Carol Wolman

What's so special about the US? by Carol Wolman

What's so special about the US? by Carol Wolman

Bush seems to believe that the US is a special nation, blessed by God to impose its form of government on the rest of the world, by force if necessary.  This, at least, is his rhetoric.  The US stands for freedom and democracy and therefore is entitled to sweep evil dictators like Saddam out of power and replace them with representative government.  So goes the myth.  It is still being used to justify our continuing presence in Iraq.
 
This myth works because it has deep roots in the psyche of America and the world.  In 1776, most of Europe was ruled by corrupt monarchies that oppressed the people.  The American revolution was the first of many that overthrew this system and replaced it with some form of constitutional representative rule.  Our Constitution became a model of how to form a government of, by, and for the people.  Its whole thrust is separation of powers, balance of powers, dispersion of powers among the three branches of the federal government, and further dispersion to state and local governments.
 
The Founding Fathers feared concentration of power in the executive branch.  They suffered under King George III and wanted to ensure that the new republic would not revert to a monarchy. 
 
With all its flaws- slavery, racism, rule by a power elite from day 1, the Constitution has allowed more power to the people than the world had seen since the days of the Roman Republic, 100 years before Christ.  America became the land of opportunity, a beacon of hope to oppressed peoples around the world.  America was called "the New Jerusalem", the "shining city on the hill". 
 
This image of America, specially blessed by God, started to be severely eroded right after the Civil War, when corporations started to usurp the legal concept of "personhood" through a series of court decisions.  For details, see www.duhc.org   Over the past 150 years, Americans have been disenfranchised, as corporate money has bought elections and politicians.  This process has speeded up since WWII, and under George W. Bush has become a feeding frenzy, whereby the public treasury is looted to the point of bankruptcy to enrich the corporate beast.  Our freedoms have likewise been diminished, and voting is such a corrupt process as to be meaningless.
 
Still, America retained some moral leadership in the post World War II world, pretending to stand, at least, for justice, human rights, respect for international law, and keeping the peace.  All such pretense is out the window under the current regime.
 
Does God still favor the US?  Does He still bless America?  How can He bless a country that lies in order to steal the oil of other nations, that kills children by the tens of thousands, that tortures prisoners, that spreads life destroying chemicals and radioactive substances over large portions of the globe?
 
America needs to repent and return to the original ways of God, practicing justice, mercy and love of one's neighbor.  Perhaps then we may be spared the economic, social, and political disasters that are looming.
 
Psalm 67:   2May Thy way be known upon earth, Thy saving health among all nations.
 
In the name of the Prince of Peace, Carol Wolman
 
Carol S. Wolman. MD is a psychiatrist and lifelong peace activist.
 
 

Fw: Freeway Bloggers

If anyone wants to join the freeway blogging movement, I suggest signs that say "Impeach Bush and Cheney"- get America used to the idea.
In Christ, Carol
----- Original Message -----
To: Rush@EIBNet.com ; kherman@statesman.com ; abramsreport@msnbc.com ; alan@alan.com ; babingtonc@washpost.com ; Beltway@FoxNews.com ; bruce98665@comcast.net ; Cash@FoxNews.com ; CapReport@cnbc.com ; Colmes@FoxNews.com ; cushman@nytimes.com ; ellengoodman@globe.com ; evening@cbsnews.com ; FNS@FoxNews.com ; foxmagazine@foxnews.com ; greenpartyusa@igc.org ; Hardball@MSNBC.com ; Imus@msnbc.com ; inquirer.letters@phillynews.com ; Jeff.newsstand@cnn.com ; jim.mills@foxnews.com ; Joe@msnbc.com ; latenight@nbc.com ; letters@cmonitor.com ; letters@detnews.com ; letters@msnbc.com ; letters@nypost.com ; Letters@prospect.org ; Malibunews@malibutimes.com ; Moneyline@CNN.com ; MTP@NBC.com ; MyWord@FoxNews.com ; newsroom@bergen.com ; Newswatch@FoxNews.com ; news@reedbusiness.com ; Nightly@NBC.com ; Oreilly@FoxNews.com ; pjnyden@wvgazette.com ; prez@usa-exile.org ; Question@msnbc.com ; Reliable@cnn.com ; REvans@mercurynews.com ; agorham@globeandmail.ca ; shadowland@newsweek.com ; Special@Foxnews.com ; tdp@nt.net ; tonightshow@nbc.com ; Wolf@CNN.com ; senator@akaka.senate.gov ; senator_bingaman@bingaman.senate.gov ; info@kenblackwell.com ; talk2bob@mail.house.gov ; kit_bond@bond.senate.gov ; rep.brady@mail.house.gov ; jim_bunning@bunning.senate.gov ; senator_byrd@byrd.senate.gov ; senator@cochran.senate.gov ; senator@collins.senate.gov ; senator@conrad.senate.gov ; john.conyers@mail.house.gov ; tom.davis@mail.house.gov ; senator@dorgan.senate.gov ; senator_domenici@domenici.senate.gov ; russell_feingold@feingold.senate.gov ; mailbox@gregg.senate.gov ; texas.granger@mail.house.gov ; chuck_hagel@hagel.senate.gov ; roger.schultz@halliburton.com ; Tom_Harkin@harkin.senate.gov ; senator_hatch@hatch.senate.gov ; Rep.Hinojosa@mail.house.gov ; vermont@jeffords.senate.gov ; rep.e.b.johnson@mail.house.gov ; tim@johnson.senate.gov ; info@kyl.senate.gov ; Senator_leahy@leahy.senate.gov ; lloyd.doggett@mail.house.gov ; senatorlott@lott.senate.gov ; senator_lugar@lugar.senate.gov ; john_mccain@mccain.senate.gov ; john.mica@mail.house.gov ; senator@mikulski.senate.gov ; senator_murray@murray.senate.gov ; rep.paul@mail.house.gov ; Petes@mail.house.gov ; senator@pryor.senate.gov ; senator@shelby.senate.gov ; olympia@snowe.senate.gov ; senator@stabenow.senate.gov ; mailbox@sununu.senate.gov ; senator_talent@talent.senate.gov ; senator_voinovich@voinovich.senate.gov ; senator@warner.senate.gov
Cc: JPEDSONJR@aol.com ; MrsMeanie@aol.com ; 48hours@cbsnews.com ; 2020@abc.com ; anita@mindgallery.com ; aweathersbee@suntimes.com ; bizday@nytimes.com ; bmccauley@enquirer.com ; bpc@cbsnews.com ; brelis@globe.com ; bsenftleber@ajc.com ; bsteiden@ajc.com ; BTBTALK@aol.com ; business@latimes.com ; buzzflash@buzzflash.com ; cgarrett@tribune.com ; cledbetter@suntimes.com ; cwarmbold@ajc.com ; ddouglas@suntimes.com ; dhorn@enquirer.com ; dolans@cnn.com ; pfeaver@duke.edu ; fboyle@law.uiuc.edu ; features@independent.co.uk ; feedback@ap.org ; foreign.news@thetimes.co.uk ; ftn@cbsnews.com ; gelpi@duke.edu ; grain@cbsnews.com ; GWashburn@tribune.com ; hklibanoff@ajc.com ; hprzybyla@bloomberg.net ; hrosenkrantz@bloomberg.net ; ldiebel@thestar.ca ; jborgman@enquirer.com ; jcruickshank@suntimes.com ; jfetzer@d.umn.edu ; jloven@ap.org ; jzeleny@tribune.com ; kcarroll@ap.org ; kcooper@globe.com ; lettersbwol@businessweek.com ; rnarayanan@ajc.com ; metrodesk@latimes.com ; mike@mikemalloy.com ; msilverman@ap.org ; national@nytimes.com ; news-ombud@globe.com ; newsonline@bbc.co.uk ; npickler@ap.org ; oliphant@globe.com ; online.editor@thetimes.co.uk ; op-ed@latimes.com ; pbriant@globeandmail.ca ; query@cambridgeforum.org ; rcribb@thestar.ca ; rfournier@ap.org ; richard_dunham@businessweek.com ; rkemper@tribune.com ; rrhodes@airamericaradio.com ; showcase@suntimes.com ; sjohnson@ap.org ; SKuczka@tribune.com ; sneed@suntimes.com ; talk2us@americasblackforum.com ; thisweek@abc.com ; valley@latimes.com ; ventura@latimes.com ; washington@nytimes.com ; weblog@guardianunlimited.co.uk ; wilsonc@timesrecordnews.com
Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2005 7:39 AM
Subject: Signs of the Times




    Print This Story  E-mail This Story


What do you think? The t r u t h o u t Town Meeting is in progress. Join the debate!

    Go to Original

    American Graffiti: Signs of the Times
    By Rupert Cornwell
    The Independent UK

    Friday 12 August 2005
President Bush used to enjoy healthy support for his Iraq policy. But now freeway 'bloggers' are speaking out, writes Rupert Cornwell.


    Feel like getting something off your chest against that iniquitous warmonger in the White House? Well, you can write a letter to your newspaper, tune in to liberal talk radio, or click to a reliably leftie website. Alternatively, you can take a drive on the highways of the United States.
    These are the domain of the freeway bloggers, a breed that have invented a tangible concrete and tarmac version of the internet to make their feelings known about George Bush. The messages, posted from overpasses, bridges and verges, are short, pithy and very, very rude.
    How many of these bloggers are out there? No one really knows. Who are they? Mainly, it would seem, young men of a mildly anarchic disposition, with a message to get out, a modest talent for gymnastics and a pronounced taste for the adrenalin rush of their trade.
    Are they breaking the law? Perhaps, though it's hard to argue that anti-Bush ranting is any more distracting to drivers than the raunchy fashion ads, local TV station posters and the other beacons of rampant consumerism that adorn every US highway.
    These advertisers have to pay for the privilege of course - but what about that hallowed first amendment of the US Constitution, guaranteeing free speech and free expression?
    Nor is the technique illegal. Back in that distant 18-month period of unalloyed patriotism between the 11 September attacks and the first adrenalin-fuelled days of the Iraq war, America's highways blossomed flags, diatribes against Osama bin Laden, and myriad calls to back the troops.
    Now the politics has changed, and the messages have a darker ring. Next to an old sign bearing the message "Support our troops", a freeway blogger has added his suggestion as to how this might be best achieved: "Impeach the murdering bastards who sent them to die for a pack of les."
    Another notes: "No one died when Clinton lied." Another cuts to the quick of the CIA leak scandal lapping at the President's top political adviser: "We support Karl Rove," says the message on the banner, signed "Americans 4 Treason.org"
    Whether they are having a effect is debatable. Approval ratings for Mr. Bush and his handling of the war are sliding to record lows - but the 1,800-plus US soldiers killed in Iraq, the 10,000 seriously wounded, and a seemingly unquenchable insurgency surely have a lot more to do with it than the musings of these 21st century political graffiti artists.
    Unarguably however, freeway blogging is a highly efficient means of expression. "A blog takes me about seven minutes to trace and paint, six seconds to hang," says one practitioner. The materials - cardboard or cloth and paint- cost only a few dollars, and affixing them is also pretty simple.
    According to one set of instructions posted on the internet, smaller signs should be placed against fencing and strapped in position with strong bungee cords. For larger signs, coat hangers as well as duct tape are recommended. The hangers should be taped to the top of the sign and then twisted around the fencing, before being fastened with the bungee cords.
    And don't worry about the fencing obstructing the view. As long as the letters are six inches high, a sign will be perfectly legible. As for location, anywhere (almost) goes. Not just overpasses and verges, but "anything you can see while driving is a place you can put a sign", the instructions advise would-be bloggers.
    "The more difficult it is to reach, the longer it'll stay up. Tens, even hundreds of thousands of people can drive by a sign before one of them takes so much as five minutes to take it down. Apart from actual prisoners, you won't find a more captive audience than people in their cars." Some of the signs disappear in minutes. But others stay up for months.
    As a general rule, another blog-artist comments on the website www.freewayblogger.com, the larger the sign, the faster it comes down. "The most effective signs I post are small reminders along the peripheries of the freeway such as 'The war is a lie', or 'Osama Bin Forgotten'."
    The spoilsports who take them down are, he presumes, "cops, highway workers and Republicans". But who cares, in the easy-come, easy-go world of the freeway blogs. "So long as you can keep putting them up, it really doesn't matter."
    In a way, moreover, the medium is even more effective than the internet from which it draws its name. Political cyberspace is divided into ghettos of the left and the right - but as an aficionado puts it, "When you put something on the freeway, you get everybody."
    And on the jammed California freeways where the art form was pioneered, everybody means a lot of people - tens, even hundreds of thousands of commuters on an eight-lane highway, all with no choice but to read these roadside political statements. For Republican drivers, it must be hell. But for the freeway blogger, life doesn't get any better.