Monday, September 19, 2005

Fw: Let them Die or Let them go By Mike Whitney

When, o when will the basic decency of the American people reassert itself?  Only ONE newspaper in the entire US has reported on the plight of the hunger strikers at Guantanamo.
 
Romans 2:5 But after thy hardness and impenitent heart treasurest up unto thyself wrath against the day of wrath and revelation of the righteous judgment of God.
----- Original Message -----
From: A
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 5:38 PM

Let them Die or Let them go 

By Mike Whitney 

09/19/05 "
ICH" -- -- I have a word of advice I would like to offer Donald Rumsfeld and the Pentagon chieftains who currently preside over the 200 or more hunger-strikers at Guantanamo Bay, 20 of whom are near death. For God's sake, let them die. 

What more could you possibly want from them? 

They've already provided you with the subjects you needed for your newly-perfected sense-deprivation techniques and your sadistic methods of torture. They supplied you with the lab-rats for your new drugs, your improved methods of psychological torment, and your sexually-deviant abuses. Now, let them die. The experiment is over. Show that there is some speck of humanity left in your withered heart by allowing these men to pass away with dignity; the dignity you deprived them of in life. 

The hunger-strike has been going on for 6 weeks. That means that a considerable number of the prisoners are undergoing the latter phases of physical deterioration. Many are probably vomiting blood by now and too weak to either walk or stand on their own. Their liver and kidney-functions have begun to fail and their vision has begun to weaken; putting additional pressure on the heart to continue working while the body is slowly devouring itself. 

Let them die. 

If the Pentagon allowed the media to visit Guantanamo, they would see the emaciated, skeletal victims of Bush's war on terror, the proof that America now oversees Nazi-like death camps. But, the media has shown little interest in the suffering of the prisoners even though it is widely acknowledged that many were randomly rounded up by warlords in Afghanistan and ransomed to the Americans. 

So far, only one newspaper in the country, "The Minnesota Daily", has spoken out on behalf of the prisoners on their editorial page. The newspaper stated: 

"While morality and ethics are abstract ideas, justice is more concrete, hence why there are laws. Guantanamo and the actions that have been taken by our government against the detainees violate the Geneva Convention, the Bill of Rights, and our Constitution. Justice is not merely a conditional idea." 

The Minnesota Daily is the solitary voice in the media-wilderness to defend the essential rights of these casualties in Bush's war, but with little effect. Washington's justice has nothing to do with mercy or rehabilitation, but with punishment alone. 

There won't be any cameras or journalists at Guantanamo. The face that America sees is the tan-and-rested visage of President Fraudster offering his soothing commentary on another part of the globe destroyed by his recklessness. The pictures of Bush's dungeons are left on the cutting-room floor with the other unflattering footage of American brutality. That certainly won't change now. 

The prisoners follow in the long tradition of hunger-strikers from Gandhi to Bobby Sands. Their demands are simple. They want the ability to challenge the terms of their imprisonment in court. 

That's it; the most basic of all human rights, to be informed of the crime for which they are being held and the opportunity to defend themselves against those charges. It's a right that they are entitled to under international law, but have been denied by Washington. 

The Pentagon has done nothing to address the inmates' demands and steadfastly refuses to meet with their leaders. Instead, they have taken the low-road by hand-cuffing and putting leg-irons on the sickliest and force-feeding them intravenously or through nose-drips. 

Let them die. 

The United States has established itself well-beyond the rule of law; a rogue state that refuses to comply with even the minimal standards of decency required under the Geneva Conventions. Guantanamo Bay is the administration's ultimate achievement; a torture-gulag devoted to the cruel and inhuman treatment of its enemies; an icon to lawlessness and savagery. 

The administration now asserts its power over death-itself; a final means of humiliating its victims and perpetuating their suffering. Rumsfeld's feeding-tubes are the last slim thread that tethers these men to a lifetime of detention, abuse, and hopelessness. Let them die or let them go

Secrecy by Carol Wolman

Secrecy by Carol Wolman

The Bush government has been called the most secretive government in the history of the US.  Hurricane Katrina raises a host of questions, the answers to which are hidden.  Here are just a few that come to my mind.
 
What happened to all the money given to FEMA under the Homeland Security Act?  How come it is less able to respond to a hurricane now than prior to 9-11, when help was quick and efficient?
 
Why is the press being excluded from the cleanup of New Orleans?  Why doesn't the administration want independent verification of the number of people killed in the flooding?
 
There are rumors circulating that the levees were deliberately blown up.  Is this true?  Shouldn't such an accusation be investigated?
 
Why did FEMA turn away the agencies that usually help in a disaster- the Red Cross, the Army, Amtrak, civilian volunteers?
 
Why did Bush make a special point of returning the budget to Congress in June 2005 and demanding that funds for protection of New Orleans from flooding be slashed? 
 
Why have no-bid contracts for rebuilding the city already been handed out to Bush cronies like Halliburton?
 
Secrecy implies wrongdoing, information that needs to be hidden because its revelation would lead to accountability.  The investigation process is tedious and slow, and easily manipulated by perpetrators of evil.  Yet it must be carried out.  The calls for an independent body to look into what went wrong with the response to Katrina are important, although apt to be overlooked in the clamor over Roberts for the Supreme Court. 
 
It's time to demand answers, and restore transparency in government.  If the Bush administration is guilty of criminal negligence, conspiracy, profiteering in the case of Katrina, we have further grounds for impeachment.
 
Luke 8: 17For nothing is secret, that shall not be made manifest; neither any thing hid, that shall not be known and come abroad.
 
In the name of the Prince of Peace,   Carol Wolman