Monday, December 13, 2004

Fw: Bush: worse than Saddam to Iraqis

 
----- Original Message -----
From: Karim A G
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 8:53 AM
Subject: Fallujah - America's Halabja

Fallujah - America's Halabja

Yamin Zakaria

London, UK

yaminz@yahoo.co.uk

 

 "People never lie so much as after a hunt, during a war or before an election."

(Otto Von Bismarck - Prussian Prime Minister

1815-1898)

 

Indeed corporate driven wars of Capitalist nations and elections share the trait of 'deception'. This is expected as elections are the usual means to get into the driving seat to prosecute wars. Wars are primarily driven by corporate interests diluted with chauvinistic nationalism concealed by lofty slogans.

 

However, why the need to conceal the true motives and deceive its own masses? Because, it is the ordinary citizens that always pays the price by getting used as Cannon Fodder.

 

Michael Moore vividly demonstrated this in his documentary (Fahrenheit 9/11) when he tried to get the members of Congress to enlist their sons and daughters in the war, none showed any interest in their children being used as Cannon Fodder. To date only one member of Congress has a child serving in Iraq. Instead, the corporate machinery happily recruit and send the underprivileged Afro-Americans and Hispanics kids along with Green Card applicants like it was done during the Vietnam war. Iraq was no different, governed by a handful of self-serving elites with the Western inspired secular Baathist ideology. The leading Generals and the elites either betrayed or simply capitulated leaving the ordinary soldiers and the defenceless civilians to face the American onslaught.

 

The lies generated to deceive the masses can be subtle like some of the media spins that are regularly generated, often with help from the pro-Zionists camps but they can also be stark and stupid, as for example George W. Bush said:

 

"Free nations don't develop weapons of mass destruction." (George W. Bush)[i] I am sure many are laughing whilst others are scratching their heads, asking, what is this man really saying? This type of idiotic claims is not uncommon. Recently one right-wing Christian Fundamentalist alleged that most of the college professors are communists, her reasons for coming to such conclusion is based on their anti-War stance. The most educated sections of the American society are perhaps facing an uphill struggle to enlighten these close-minded and brainwashed2 citizens. Instead, they prefer to listen to the 'wisdom' of George W. Bush, who talks to God and frequently claims that God is on his side. This all sounds like the mindset of medieval Europe operating in the heart of the "Fee World".

 

Bush has already implied many times that nations that are not approved by the US are not 'free', therefore, was it Iraq, North Korea, Iran, Afghanistan or Syria that invented Nuclear, Biological and Chemical weapons? On the contrary, it was the "free" nations that have invented these weapons of mass destruction and are constantly enhancing them. The US military budget for research and development is larger than many nations GDP put together. The so-called 'free' nations are the ones who have used them against civilians and have the largest stockpile and make the most profit through their lucrative arms industry in the business of genocide and destruction.

 

In the case of Iraq, what is so unusual is that the lies used to prosecute the war and deceive the masses have turned out to be self-incriminating as the following points will demonstrate and jog some memories.

 

· WMD - Iraq was invaded under the pretext of removing its alleged WMDs, but now we know for certain that the only WMD found in Iraq was that used by the Americans, literally or its equivalent; for example when we witnessed the initial "Shock and Awe" campaign reported by the Fox-TV crew with big smiles on their faces. Furthermore, many independent reports are emerging from Fallujah pointing to the use of Chemical weapons by the US forces.

 

· Human Rights Violation - The propaganda machine amplified Saddam's violation of human rights after failing to find WMDs. However, the US was already complicit with Saddam Hussein back in the 80s. Then the shameless treatment and incarcerations of the captives in Camp-X-Ray. Eventually, the US was caught red-handed softening up prisoners like Saddam Hussein's regime in Abu-Ghraib. There are also video clips showing US soldiers killing civilians on the streets and executing wounded Iraqis. Such examples are clear violation of basic human rights that the US constantly preaches about and certainly dwarfs Saddam Hussein's track record.

 

· Mass Graves - Saddam's mass graves have so far turned out to be around 5,000 from the prewar hype of hundreds of thousands to millions. This has been easily surpassed by the US made mass graves in Fallujah alone; the total number of victims estimated for the entire war3 is around 40,000 to 100,000. This is excluding the mass graves generated by the US led sanctions and its wanton massacre of the Iraqis retreating on the road to Basra in 1991.

 

· Executions - The pre-war propaganda of Saddam's evil executioners was replaced with the corporate style grotesque monsters called 'civilian' contractors. They were behaving worse than animals, and led to the just Iraqi retribution by killing and mutilating the four contractors back in April 2004. The result was unsatisfactory as those

'contractors' should have been tortured to death slowly as they were doing to the Iraqis inside Abu-Ghraib and other US-run prisons.4 · Foreign Fighters5 - Iraqi masses had no problems with the fellow Arabs and Muslims coming to their aid, sharing the same language, culture and religion and it seems the only foreigners in that region were the Anglo-Saxon war criminals and their mercenaries. Most certainly the porn-culture and the porn-torture of Abu-Ghraib are definitely foreign to the Iraqi masses.

 

· Terrorism - If terrorism is the indiscriminate killing and terrorizing of civilians then who has a better track record by the facts on the grounds, Abu-Musab Al-Zarqawi or George W. Bush? Let's not forget that the former is a freedom fighter retaliating the latter is an illegal criminal invader as the General Secretary of the UN, Kofi Annan clearly spelt out after the war that it was illegal. Hence, one cannot even make the comparison.

 

· Dictators - After having a convenient amnesia about Saddam's American origin, as the CIA agent Geoffrey Kemp said "Saddam was a son of a bitch but he was our son of a bitch", the US installed another Dictator who has already proven to be just as ruthless after failing with a Ahmed Chalabi who was known criminal.

Iyad Allawi personally executed six prisoners by shooting them at close range. He then gave the recent 'fatwa' permitting his National Guards infested with Kurdish bandits from the Peshmergas (or Front of Muggers) tribe to take the women of Fallujah as booty, i.e. legalizing rape!

 

· Oil - Despite the early denials, the world saw through the real reasons for the enthusiasm displayed by the US to 'save' the poor Iraqis from Saddam. No such enthusiasm was ever exhibited for the Rwandans, apartheid South Africa and the long suffering Palestinians. The oil ministries were never bombed unlike the other civilian facilities in Iraq. After the oil revenues were seized, contracts awarded without bid to the well-connected Cheney-Halliburton and billions of oil revenue went 'missing'. Even the shameless theft from Iraqi household was taking place as one Iraqi old woman cried on TV, stating that the US soldiers stole her money, which she saved up to perform the pilgrimage to Mecca.

 

· Occupation - The primary pretexts of Saddam and WMDs are no longer there so what is the reason for the continuing occupation. Those lying pro-war prostitutes within are silent as when they vociferously, cunningly and even naively urged the US to bomb Iraq to save it from Saddam! As if the US is a charitable institution!

Have they not seen the language deployed by the US intelligentsia towards the Arabs? They are described as rag-heads, sand-niggers, camel-humpers, goat-humpers. This is expected from a xenophobic society.

 

· Democracy - Election and George Bush has always been controversial! It would have been nice to see genuine free elections inside the US that are not fixed in advance by the corporate lobbies. Many of the able leaders in Iraq that did not comply with the US interests are being systematically targeted. The calls for elections were resisted from the onset, Rumsfeld and Bremer stated that elections would be permitted as long as an Islamic government was not produced. So there you go 'democracy' i.e. "rule of the Iraqis by the Iraqis for the Corporate-Americans" Now the desperate attempts to hold elections in January under occupation will be no different to the elections held under Saddam; simultaneously it will provide a good exit opportunity for the US forces, giving pseudo independence to Iraq.

 

· Halabja Syndrome (War Crimes) - Another pre-war hype was resurrecting the 15 year old event at Halabja at the time the US was the chief supplier to Saddam Hussein. The alleged gassing of the Kurds by Saddam Hussein is disputed by the CIA itself. But, even if we assume that Halabja was the work of Saddam and it was deliberate but that has been repeated by the US in Fallujah as many reports of Chemical weapons used in the area are emerging. One doctor has already identified corpses without any external injury and discolored. Many corpses are burnet indicating the use of Napalm and Phosphorus bombs: "Halabja in Fallujah".

 

A leading lawmaker from Turkey's governing Justice and Development Party (AKP) on Thursday accused the United States of committing "genocide" in Fallujah. He went on to state that: "genocide of such proportions was committed neither under Mussolini, nor Hitler". This is why the US deliberately sealed the place from independent press coverage, prevented the Medical help by deliberately attacking hospitals and doctors who back in April gave independent verification of the casualty figures.

The US was not just trying to hide figures but how the operation was conducted. Multiple reports from many sources indicates that the US policy was to shoot indiscriminately at civilians, even old women with a white flag raised were shot, ordinary people trying to cross the river fleeing away from Fallujah were shot at by the 'brave' Marines. Since Kofi Annan declared the war to be illegal along with most of the world all the direct and consequential killings resulted from the invasion constitutes a clear war crimes committed by the US.

 

Now, why the US denial of using Chemical weapons is not being verified by the UN or some other independent body? Or is the UN only there to verify and support American allegations against other nations? Why the neighbouring Arab/Muslim regimes are silent on this sheer barbarism? What happened to Arab and Islamic unity? Where are those "Moderates" who are enthusiastic to label resistance fighters as terrorists but it seems they are perfectly comfortable to accept this type of savagery? Their ugly hypocritical lips were sealed after the Abu-Ghraib revelations, maybe the seal is permanent.

In the meantime, the Evangelical 'Christians' of America celebrated another Pagan festival of Thanksgiving on the 25th of November. The indulgent and obese American society gave little thought about the carnage in Fallujah. Their media is always reversing the burden of guilt by spinning the facts, making the victims as the aggressors and the aggressors as the victims6, so that the American dream can live on giving the world a nightmare.

 

 Copyright © 2004 by Yamin Zakaria.

Fw: [wvns] James Carroll: The Moral Abyss

Message

Your ways, O LORD, make known to me;
teach me Your paths,
Guide me in Your truth and teach me,
for You are God my savior.
Psalm 25: 4-5
Let us not be misled by the self-righteousness of the false Christians who put Bush into office.  Let us rather pray that God will show us His ways and teach us His paths.   Let us pray for faith that He will help us to pull our country out of the moral abyss of the Pharisees. 
 
In the name of the Prince of Peace,  Carol Wolman
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 3:52 AM
Subject: FW: [wvns] James Carroll: The Moral Abyss

The main horror of what the "coalition" is doing is not a matter of
the occasional soldier who, in the heat of battle, commits a war
crime, but the steady destruction rained on cities, villages, the
Iraqi people. This violence is wreaked calmly, from a distance,
within the rules of engagement.

The war itself is the American war crime. But that is lost in
the "normalcy" of the news.


Afraid To Look in the Moral Abyss
by James Carroll
http://207.44.245.159/article7436.htm


12/07/04 "Boston Globe" -- Why don't we Americans look directly at
the war? We avert our gaze, knowing that the situation in Iraq grows
more desperate by the day. Vaunted "coalition" efforts to "break the
back" of the "insurgency" have only strengthened it. The violence
among Iraqis would surely qualify as civil war -- except that only
one side is fighting. The structures of relief and repair are gone.
Whole cities are destroyed, populations displaced. The hope of Iraqi
elections is mortally compromised. "Coalition" members are dropping
out. The mission of American force is to secure the country, but it
can't secure itself. The performance of US intelligence has been
consistent: Its strategic failures caused the war, and its tactical
ignorance of the enemy is losing the war.

Meanwhile, in America, this, the gravest foreign policy crisis in a
generation, source of a crisis of conscience for tens of millions of
citizens, is not a subject of political debate. For many months,
overt opposition to the war was sublimated in the effort to defeat
George W. Bush in the November election. John Kerry's fatal
ambivalence about Iraq sealed the war off from the great quadrennial
decision, with the result that the voices of those who hated the war
were muted, and the uneasiness of those who were troubled by it was
never addressed.

Astoundingly, the Democrats cooperated with the Republicans in
assuring that the war in Iraq -- the one thing that might have
defeated Bush -- was not an issue. That marginalization of the anti-
war impulse continues in the suspended animation of a period after
the American election and before the Iraqi election.

The new Bush administration has moved to reconfigure itself in most
ways but one. The president's affirmation of Secretary of Defense
Donald Rumsfeld, in combination with his naming of Condoleezza Rice
as secretary of state, reflects a blind determination to "stay the
course" in Iraq, never mind that the course is heading off a cliff.

The main US news media treat the "story" of Iraq as if it is a
morality tale about 20-year-old Americans -- a few of whom are shown
making bad choices, but most of whom are lionized as heroes. When
their deaths are mourned on television each night -- that
heartbreaking silence under those smiling commissary snapshots --
the effect is to deepen the paralysis of the American public, which
can only look away.

The barbarity of the Iraqi insurgency has been a particular source
of repugnance. First it was hostage-taking, and beheading -- low-
tech "shock and awe" assaults aimed at "foreigners," precisely to
terrorize their sponsoring populations. The apparent murder of the
admirable Margaret Hassan, war-opponent and humanitarian worker, was
especially deplorable.

Then it was systematic attacks on Iraqis themselves, anyone daring
to cooperate with the "coalition" occupiers. The execution-style
murders of Iraqi police recruits and soldiers in recent weeks has
been chilling, and now workers on a bus are massacred. What makes
these tactics so appalling is their intensely personal character.

But it takes a disciplined imagination to acknowledge that the less
personal savageries of bombs, missiles, artillery, and heavy weapons
are, to those blown to smithereens, also barbaric. The main horror
of what the "coalition" is doing is not a matter of the occasional
soldier who, in the heat of battle, commits a war crime, but the
steady destruction rained on cities, villages, the Iraqi people.
This violence is wreaked calmly, from a distance, within the rules
of engagement.

The war itself is the American war crime. But that is lost in
the "normalcy" of the news.

On the other side, it is the proliferation of suicide-bombing that
has come to seem normal. Soldiers commonly risk their lives for
nation, honor, or buddy -- but they will not kill themselves with
forethought, in large numbers, except for the most transcendent of
reasons. The United States has given itself an enemy that shows by
its central tactic that it is fighting for God.

Americans, meanwhile, are so confused about religion that we have
just been through an election in which "religious values" were
defined as key, but precisely in ways that kept the war out of the
discussion. America's purpose in Iraq is a compound of such
deflection, self-deception, half-measures, and shallow thinking. The
opposition, meanwhile, is absolute and unblinking. That difference
partly answers the question with which this column began, but mainly
we avert our eyes because the war is a moral abyss. If we dare to
look, as Nietzsche said, the abyss stares back.

James Carroll's column appears regularly in the Globe. His most
recent book is "Crusade: Chronicles of an Unjust War."

© 2004 Boston Globe

*********************************************************************
  
WORLD VIEW NEWS SERVICE

To subscribe to this group, send an email to:
wvns-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

NEWS ARCHIVE IS OPEN TO PUBLIC VIEW
http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/wvns/













Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
click here


Yahoo! Groups Links