Thursday, November 11, 2004

Fw: "tanks" in LA streets were lost, friendly

 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 6:39 PM
Subject: Comments on tanks in LA streets

BG:  I picked up these comments from the indymedia site..  It looks as tho the tanks had lost their way, probably on the way to a Veterans Day parade...
-----------------------------------------------------------
Was @ Fed. bldg. on eve of 9th...
Calling out words of war protest, several of the soldiers gave us the thumbs up. One person gave them literature on finding help to get out as they seemed to have an empathy for the cries of the crowd.
BUT THEN an utterly moronic woman started screaming at them that they were murderers and baby killers and other foul verbal attacks. I gently shared with her the fact that the three men in the tank in front of us appeared supportive, then she screamed at me even more hateful sentiments...
So, like, didn't we learn anything from Viet Nam, mostly in regard to the importance of the human beings that are soldiers who have become caught in the middle of the nightmare? So many of the kids in the military today come from financial disadvantage and this was a way to be able to afford an education.
TRUST ME, those KIDS IN THE TANKS are most likely scared to hell about what they are about to face.
People irrationally screaming hideous accusations at soldiers are not helping, but are rather hurting the "cause". It isn't the soldiers that should be hated, go after our leadership with your words of anger, go after those who compel little boys to be forced into acts of war. ...Too bad someone doesn't ship Bush's daughters off to the front lines, wouldn't that make us all much more trusting of the President's resolve in sending other people's children to be killed?!
* * * * * *
...well, there is a housefly in my kitchen, can I get some republican idiot to send an Apache helicopter to dispatch it? ....just send the bill to the taxpayer.....

* * * * * *
I was among the protestors at the Federal Building on November 9th. I believe out nation faces profound risks and has lost its moral compass by adopting the Bush preemptive attack doctrine. His extraordinary and close-minded positions require extraordinary energy in opposition. When the "tanks" (okay LAV's) passed us the first time, we all just found it to be utterly bizarre. When they came back, it seemed way past bizarre. The comment under the lead "Robo Cop" says he was in one of the LAV's and that their visit was not part of some intended "fly by" exercise. I'm glad that he weighed in here; it is comforting to know that some of the soldiers know we are out here and participate in the discourse. He doesn't say what they were doing there. Maybe, they were on some other top secret mission to protect Westwood (or just a little too embarrassed to admit that they couldn't navigate LA streets). I don't really buy either of those explanations, but I suppose I still believe his statement that this was not intimidation directed at the protest (since that goal wouldn't make sense either). In the middle of the incident, I did not perceive any animosity from the soldiers on the LAV's (they actually seemed friendly). I also want to note that the LAPD, who stepped in, were also controlled and professional. Young men in uniform are instruments to carry out the policies of our country's leadership. Although that makes most of them pawns for George Bush's wrongheaded plans, many of them (unlike their commander in chief) are conscientious and openminded citizens. We don't want to alienate them unnecessarily. They are faced with a dilemma that no American should be forced to deal with. In my view, the protestors were (in general) not hostile to the soldiers either -- although everyone was anxious to make it clear that U.S. military vehicles don't belong at antiwar protests for any reason. Oh, of course, a few protestors can't resist overstating the message when faced with troops and military vehicles. Hey, most people who take some hours out of their daily lives to hold signs on public streets have deeply felt emotions.

The "incident" arose in the context of post-election 2004. The Bush Administration has made it all too clear that they will now be increasingly aggressive in pursuing their extreme right wing agenda, both domestically and abroad, while reaching across the political spectrum to reconcile with everyone who agrees with that agenda (huh?). So, I guess the Westwood incident was probably just some freaky thing. That was this time. But, in an odd way, this does foretell where we are headed.
* * * * *
Those weren't 'tanks' they were Marine APCs. They were obviously on their way to another location and crossed paths with the protest. Apparently a lot conspiratorial overreactors seem to think it was planned. The Marines on the other hand looked befuddled about the whole thing.
* * * * * * *
Story is also at http://www.DemWatch.blogspot.com and http://www.MyDD.com
Lost LAVs

Hey guys. Some people aren't going to be convinced that this was NOT an attempt to stifle expression, but this sounded fishy to me from the start. Thursday is Veteran's Day and today is the USMCs 229th birthday. The vehicles in question are LAV-25s, not Strykers or Coyotes. They're operated exclusively by the USMC.
* * * * *
A post script:
After I tried to share with my fellow female to have compassion for the soldiers who gave us the thumbs up, and she then lit into me with her venom, a man in the crowd re-acted in suit and began screaming at the soldiers with the same hostility... then another, then another; it started a wildfire of hate amongst a portion of the crowd and caused a sadness in the eyes of the boy/soldier in the rear tank, possibly even some fear of us...
How sad.
How sad.
* * * * *
-
BG
thinkcivic@aol.com











































Fw: Condolences to the Palestinian people

 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 5:07 PM
Subject: Condolences to the Palestinian people

November 11, 2004

 

TO: Churches for Middle East Peace Email Network

FROM: Corinne Whitlatch

RE: Condolences to the Palestinian people

This email alert is also posted on our website at: http://www.cmep.org/Alerts/2004Nov11.htm

 

This note was faxed to the PLO Mission to the United States this morning. Following the CMEP note is an excerpt from a statement of the Lutheran World Federation.   

 

 On behalf of Churches for Middle East Peace, Corinne Whitlatch sends condolences to the Palestinian people.  We join them as they mourn the loss of their historic leader and president, Yasser Arafat.

 

We remember his life of service to the Palestinian people. Yasser Arafat’s long commitment to good relations between Palestinian Christians and Muslims sets an important example for his people and the region, and we hope it will be part of his legacy. 

 

The refusal of Prime Minister Sharon and President Bush to negotiate with President Arafat has blocked a political process for far too long. We urge resumption of a political process that can restore hope to both Israelis and Palestinians that their future has promise. We pray that Yasser Arafat’s dedication to a Palestinian state living in peace with its neighbor Israel will come to fruition.

  

(Excerpt) Statement from the Lutheran World Federation on Yasser Arafat's Death
 

"Yasser Arafat's death is a seismic event in both Palestinian and Israeli history, the consequences of which are unpredictable. However, opportunity as well as risk invariably accompanies such a change. In this new era in the entangled history of Israelis and Palestinians in the Holy Land, a renewed and active commitment by leaders of both communities to dialogue instead of violence can yet bring peace to a land wracked by conflict. Israelis and Palestinians must together find a way to peace - a genuine peace that is secured by justice, mutual acceptance and reconciliation. They must find a way to break the mutually self-destructive cycle of violence. Both peoples share a land, a heritage and a promise. For the children of Abraham, both Israelis and Palestinians, there is no alternative to peaceful co-existence.

We pray that God will loosen hatred's grip on human hearts, and that God's peace will descend on the
land of Christ's birth. We pray that Israelis and Palestinians will work together for peace. We call on the Palestinian leadership and the Government of Israel to grasp the opportunity for change and for a return to dialogue. And we call on the Government of the United States of America, the other members of the 'Quartet', and all members of the international community to re-engage in the search for peace in Israel-Palestine and to accompany its peoples and their leaders on the path to peace."

 

--------------------------------------------
Formed in 1984, Churches for Middle East Peace is a Washington-based program of the Alliance of Baptists, American Friends Service Committee, Antiochian Orthodox Archdiocese of America, Catholic Conference of Major Superiors of Men's Institutes, Christian Church (Disciples of Christ), Church of the Brethren, Church World Service, Episcopal Church, Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, Franciscan Mission Service, Friends Committee on National Legislation, Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of North America, Maryknoll Missioners, Mennonite Central Committee, National Council of Churches, Presbyterian Church (USA), Reformed Church in America, Unitarian Universalist Association, United Church of Christ, and the United Methodist Church (GBCS & GBGM) .  For further information, see
www.cmep.org  

 

Contributions to CMEP are tax deductible and can be made by check or on www.cmep.org by secure, on-line credit card service.

 

******************************************************
To remove your address from this network, send a note to
cmepdc@aol.com

Churches for Middle East Peace
110 Maryland Ave NE, #311
Washington, DC 20002
Telephone (202) 543-1222
Fax: 202-543-5025
www.cmep.org 

"Confessions of an Economic Hit Man" Amy Goodman interview with John Perkins

 
----- Original Message -----
From: A
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 1:54 AM
Subject: full transcript read details!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

We speak with John Perkins, a former respected member of the international banking community. In his book Confessions of an Economic Hit Man he describes how as a highly paid professional, he helped the U.S. cheat poor countries around the globe out of trillions of dollars by lending them more money than they could possibly repay and then take over their economies. [includes rush transcript]
John Perkins describes himself as a former economic hit man - a highly paid professional who cheated countries around the globe out of trillions of dollars.

20 years ago Perkins began writing a book with the working title, "Conscience of an Economic Hit Men."

Perkins writes, "The book was to be dedicated to the presidents of two countries, men who had been his clients whom I respected and thought of as kindred spirits - Jaime Roldós, president of Ecuador, and Omar Torrijos, president of Panama. Both had just died in fiery crashes. Their deaths were not accidental. They were assassinated because they opposed that fraternity of corporate, government, and banking heads whose goal is global empire. We Economic Hit Men failed to bring Roldós and Torrijos around, and the other type of hit men, the CIA-sanctioned jackals who were always right behind us, stepped in.

John Perkins goes on to write: "I was persuaded to stop writing that book. I started it four more times during the next twenty years. On each occasion, my decision to begin again was influenced by current world events: the U.S. invasion of Panama in 1980, the first Gulf War, Somalia, and the rise of Osama bin Laden. However, threats or bribes always convinced me to stop."

But now Perkins has finally published his story. The book is titled Confessions of an Economic Hit Man. John Perkins joins us now in our Firehouse studios.

  • John Perkins, from 1971 to 1981 he worked for the international consulting firm of Chas T. Main where he was a self-described "economic hit man." He is the author of the new book Confessions of an Economic Hit Man.

RUSH TRANSCRIPT

This transcript is available free of charge, however donations help us provide closed captioning for the deaf and hard of hearing on our TV broadcast. Thank you for your generous contribution.
Donate - $25, $50, $100, more...

AMY GOODMAN: John Perkins joins us now in our firehouse studio. Welcome to Democracy Now!

JOHN PERKINS: Thank you, Amy. It’s great to be here.

AMY GOODMAN: It’s good to have you with us. Okay, explain this term, “economic hit man,” e.h.m., as you call it.

JOHN PERKINS: Basically what we were trained to do and what our job is to do is to build up the American empire. To bring -- to create situations where as many resources as possible flow into this country, to our corporations, and our government, and in fact we’ve been very successful. We’ve built the largest empire in the history of the world. It's been done over the last 50 years since World War II with very little military might, actually. It's only in rare instances like Iraq where the military comes in as a last resort. This empire, unlike any other in the history of the world, has been built primarily through economic manipulation, through cheating, through fraud, through seducing people into our way of life, through the economic hit men. I was very much a part of that.

AMY GOODMAN: How did you become one? Who did you work for?

JOHN PERKINS: Well, I was initially recruited while I was in business school back in the late sixties by the National Security Agency, the nation's largest and least understood spy organization; but ultimately I worked for private corporations. The first real economic hit man was back in the early 1950's, Kermit Roosevelt, the grandson of Teddy, who overthrew of government of Iran, a democratically elected government, Mossadegh’s government who was Time's magazine person of the year; and he was so successful at doing this without any bloodshed -- well, there was a little bloodshed, but no military intervention, just spending millions of dollars and replaced Mossadegh with the Shah of Iran. At that point, we understood that this idea of economic hit man was an extremely good one. We didn't have to worry about the threat of war with Russia when we did it this way. The problem with that was that Roosevelt was a C.I.A. agent. He was a government employee. Had he been caught, we would have been in a lot of trouble. It would have been very embarrassing. So, at that point, the decision was made to use organizations like the C.I.A. and the N.S.A. to recruit potential economic hit men like me and then send us to work for private consulting companies, engineering firms, construction companies, so that if we were caught, there would be no connection with the government.

AMY GOODMAN: Okay. Explain the company you worked for.

JOHN PERKINS: Well, the company I worked for was a company named Chas. T. Main in Boston, Massachusetts. We were about 2,000 employees, and I became its chief economist. I ended up having fifty people working for me. But my real job was deal-making. It was giving loans to other countries, huge loans, much bigger than they could possibly repay. One of the conditions of the loan–let's say a $1 billion to a country like Indonesia or Ecuador–and this country would then have to give ninety percent of that loan back to a U.S. company, or U.S. companies, to build the infrastructure–a Halliburton or a Bechtel. These were big ones. Those companies would then go in and build an electrical system or ports or highways, and these would basically serve just a few of the very wealthiest families in those countries. The poor people in those countries would be stuck ultimately with this amazing debt that they couldn’t possibly repay. A country today like Ecuador owes over fifty percent of its national budget just to pay down its debt. And it really can’t do it. So, we literally have them over a barrel. So, when we want more oil, we go to Ecuador and say, “Look, you're not able to repay your debts, therefore give our oil companies your Amazon rain forest, which are filled with oil.” And today we're going in and destroying Amazonian rain forests, forcing Ecuador to give them to us because they’ve accumulated all this debt. So we make this big loan, most of it comes back to the United States, the country is left with the debt plus lots of interest, and they basically become our servants, our slaves. It's an empire. There's no two ways about it. It’s a huge empire. It's been extremely successful.

AMY GOODMAN: We're talking to John Perkins, author of Confessions of an Economic Hit Man. You say because of bribes and other reason you didn't write this book for a long time. What do you mean? Who tried to bribe you, or who -- what are the bribes you accepted?

JOHN PERKINS: Well, I accepted a half a million dollar bribe in the nineties not to write the book.

AMY GOODMAN: From?

JOHN PERKINS: From a major construction engineering company.

AMY GOODMAN: Which one?

JOHN PERKINS: Legally speaking, it wasn't -- Stoner-Webster. Legally speaking it wasn't a bribe, it was -- I was being paid as a consultant. This is all very legal. But I essentially did nothing. It was a very understood, as I explained in Confessions of an Economic Hit Man, that it was -- I was -- it was understood when I accepted this money as a consultant to them I wouldn't have to do much work, but I mustn't write any books about the subject, which they were aware that I was in the process of writing this book, which at the time I called “Conscience of an Economic Hit Man.” And I have to tell you, Amy, that, you know, it’s an extraordinary story from the standpoint of -- It's almost James Bondish, truly, and I mean--

AMY GOODMAN: Well that's certainly how the book reads.

JOHN PERKINS: Yeah, and it was, you know? And when the National Security Agency recruited me, they put me through a day of lie detector tests. They found out all my weaknesses and immediately seduced me. They used the strongest drugs in our culture, sex, power and money, to win me over. I come from a very old New England family, Calvinist, steeped in amazingly strong moral values. I think I, you know, I’m a good person overall, and I think my story really shows how this system and these powerful drugs of sex, money and power can seduce people, because I certainly was seduced. And if I hadn't lived this life as an economic hit man, I think I’d have a hard time believing that anybody does these things. And that's why I wrote the book, because our country really needs to understand, if people in this nation understood what our foreign policy is really about, what foreign aid is about, how our corporations work, where our tax money goes, I know we will demand change.

AMY GOODMAN: We're talking to John Perkins. In your book, you talk about how you helped to implement a secret scheme that funneled billions of dollars of Saudi Arabian petrol dollars back into the U.S. economy, and that further cemented the intimate relationship between the House of Saud and successive U.S. administrations. Explain.

JOHN PERKINS: Yes, it was a fascinating time. I remember well, you're probably too young to remember, but I remember well in the early seventies how OPEC exercised this power it had, and cut back on oil supplies. We had cars lined up at gas stations. The country was afraid that it was facing another 1929-type of crash–depression; and this was unacceptable. So, they -- the Treasury Department hired me and a few other economic hit men. We went to Saudi Arabia. We --

AMY GOODMAN: You're actually called economic hit men --e.h.m.’s?

JOHN PERKINS: Yeah, it was a tongue-in-cheek term that we called ourselves. Officially, I was a chief economist. We called ourselves e.h.m.'s. It was tongue-in-cheek. It was like, nobody will believe us if we say this, you know? And, so, we went to Saudi Arabia in the early seventies. We knew Saudi Arabia was the key to dropping our dependency, or to controlling the situation. And we worked out this deal whereby the Royal House of Saud agreed to send most of their petro-dollars back to the United States and invest them in U.S. government securities. The Treasury Department would use the interest from these securities to hire U.S. companies to build Saudi Arabia–new cities, new infrastructure–which we’ve done. And the House of Saud would agree to maintain the price of oil within acceptable limits to us, which they’ve done all of these years, and we would agree to keep the House of Saud in power as long as they did this, which we’ve done, which is one of the reasons we went to war with Iraq in the first place. And in Iraq we tried to implement the same policy that was so successful in Saudi Arabia, but Saddam Hussein didn't buy. When the economic hit men fail in this scenario, the next step is what we call the jackals. Jackals are C.I.A.-sanctioned people that come in and try to foment a coup or revolution. If that doesn't work, they perform assassinations. or try to. In the case of Iraq, they weren't able to get through to Saddam Hussein. He had -- His bodyguards were too good. He had doubles. They couldn’t get through to him. So the third line of defense, if the economic hit men and the jackals fail, the next line of defense is our young men and women, who are sent in to die and kill, which is what we’ve obviously done in Iraq.

AMY GOODMAN: Can you explain how Torrijos died?

JOHN PERKINS: Omar Torrijos, the President of Panama. Omar Torrijos had signed the Canal Treaty with Carter much -- and, you know, it passed our congress by only one vote. It was a highly contended issue. And Torrijos then also went ahead and negotiated with the Japanese to build a sea-level canal. The Japanese wanted to finance and construct a sea-level canal in Panama. Torrijos talked to them about this which very much upset Bechtel Corporation, whose president was George Schultz and senior council was Casper Weinberger. When Carter was thrown out (and that’s an interesting story–how that actually happened), when he lost the election, and Reagan came in and Schultz came in as Secretary of State from Bechtel, and Weinberger came from Bechtel to be Secretary of Defense, they were extremely angry at Torrijos -- tried to get him to renegotiate the Canal Treaty and not to talk to the Japanese. He adamantly refused. He was a very principled man. He had his problem, but he was a very principled man. He was an amazing man, Torrijos. And so, he died in a fiery airplane crash, which was connected to a tape recorder with explosives in it, which -- I was there. I had been working with him. I knew that we economic hit men had failed. I knew the jackals were closing in on him, and the next thing, his plane exploded with a tape recorder with a bomb in it. There's no question in my mind that it was C.I.A. sanctioned, and most -- many Latin American investigators have come to the same conclusion. Of course, we never heard about that in our country.

AMY GOODMAN: So, where -- when did your change your heart happen?

JOHN PERKINS: I felt guilty throughout the whole time, but I was seduced. The power of these drugs, sex, power, and money, was extremely strong for me. And, of course, I was doing things I was being patted on the back for. I was chief economist. I was doing things that Robert McNamara liked and so on.

AMY GOODMAN: How closely did you work with the World Bank?

JOHN PERKINS: Very, very closely with the World Bank. The World Bank provides most of the money that’s used by economic hit men, it and the I.M.F. But when 9/11 struck, I had a change of heart. I knew the story had to be told because what happened at 9/11 is a direct result of what the economic hit men are doing. And the only way that we're going to feel secure in this country again and that we're going to feel good about ourselves is if we use these systems we’ve put into place to create positive change around the world. I really believe we can do that. I believe the World Bank and other institutions can be turned around and do what they were originally intended to do, which is help reconstruct devastated parts of the world. Help -- genuinely help poor people. There are twenty-four thousand people starving to death every day. We can change that.

AMY GOODMAN: John Perkins, I want to thank you very much for being with us. John Perkins' book is called, Confessions of an Economic Hit Man.

To purchase an audio or video copy of this entire program, click here for our new online ordering or call 1 (800) 881-2359.

Fw: Hint of what's to come? How about tanks at LA anti-war protest..... Tanks?

 
----- Original Message -----
From: Tom Tully
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 5:48 PM
Subject: Fw: It can't happen here? How about tanks at LA anti-war protest..... Tanks?

Could this be the beginning of the end of our constitution and the freedoms provided by that same constitution ( Bill Of Rights)?
Has Bush shut down the media? Nothing about why the military vehicles were on the street.
Nothing coming out of Falagha Iraq. Civilian casualties etc. The military has refused to divulge any information on our military losses. Vietnam again??
Where is our Congressmen and Senators? Where are the Democratic Party leaders??? 
Tom
----- Original Message -----
From: Jan Fry
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 1:46 AM
Subject: Fw: It can't happen here? How about tanks at LA anti-war protest..... Tanks?

Does this shock you?  It should. 
Bush has misused the military all along, including for self protection.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 11:00 PM
Subject: It can't happen here? How about tanks at LA anti-war protest..... Tanks?

MARINE APCs APPEAR AT ANTI-WAR PROTEST IN WESTWOOD
LOS ANGELES, November 9, 2004 - At 7:50 PM, What were first reported to be tanks and now identified as Marine APCs showed up at an anti-war protest in front of the federal building in Westwood.

The APCs circled the block twice, the second time parking themselves in the street and directly in front of the area where most of the protesters were gathered.

Enraged, some of the people attempted to block the APCs, but police quickly cleared the street.

The people continued to protest the presence of the Marines, but after about ten minutes they drove off. It is still unclear as to why they were deployed to this location.

Video by . and Photos by Ich Bin Ein Fallujan

 

http://la.indymedia.org/

Fw: Mark Sommer: Life-affirming responses

Mark Sommer: Life-affirming responses

We haven't suffered enough to really demand change.  Things have to get worse before they get better.  It's time for Christ-consciousness.
     In the name of the Prince of Peace,  Carol Wolman
 
Jesus said in reply,
"The coming of the Kingdom of God cannot be observed,
and no one will announce, ‘Look, here it is,' or, ‘There it is.'
For behold, the Kingdom of God is among you."
Luke 17: 20-21
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 2:25 PM
Subject: Mark Sommer: Life-affirming responses

From: Mark Sommer <mark@mainstream-media.net>
Dear friends,
        Like most of you, I'm sure, in the days since the election I've passed through all the phases of mourning one experiences with a death in the family or a devastating loss. What's surprised me is how quickly that grief has turned, for me as for many others, from dread and despair into passion and determination. And more than that, for me it's been a welcome relief from almost unbearable tension of the run-up to the election, bringing a new clarity of vision about both where we stand and what we must now do. Most of all, quite despite but not in denial of what has happened, I feel a surge of positive energy. I sense that paradoxically the deepening contradictions of our current course only hasten the collapse of the old order. The real challenge for us at this moment in history is to create a new, more life-affirming way of being that can grow and thrive in place of a desperate, dying regime.

As we approach this challenge, I'd like to share several thoughts and experiences that have given me a clearer sense of how to use this apparent reversal of fortune to positive effect.
        * Despite appearances, the re-selection of George W. will only hasten the end of American empire. As my daughter Maya put it in a consoling letter to a sixth-grade classmate the day after the election, "Look at it this way: if Kerry had won, he would have faced a hostile Congress and would have been blamed for all the crises that are going to occur as a result of what he did in his first term. With Republicans holding all the reins of power for the next several years, Bush will be forced to simmer in his own problems." In the near term, the increased margin by which Republicans won the presidency and Congress would seem to give them free rein to pursue their imperial dreams. And they'll undoubtedly take it as such. But a host of factors beyond their control -- and increasingly altogether out of control -- threatens not only to slow their momentum but to bring the empire to an early end. This election did not erase the divisions that now run like a Grand Canyon through American politics and culture; indeed, it only intensified the determination of the opponents of empire on both left and right to bring a halt to what they see as a suicidal pursuit of dreams of permanent global dominance. In its wake, the Bush regime is likely to experience still more intense isolation, becoming a superpower superpariah among nations. And finally, the accelerated pursuit of empire, with its ever-growing financial burdens, will devastate a U.S. economy that has already disinvested in its own future by funneling the lion's share of its resources into counter-productive military spending, governmental malfeasance and corporate corruption.

        While some economists and political observers see a collapse of American empire occurring in twenty to thirty years, the pace at which these trends will develop in a second Bush term could substantially accelerate that time-line. In his first term, Bush sought, somewhat successfully, to defy the laws of gravity. In his second term he'll seek to repeal them altogether, a much more daunting task. The urgent question for the rest of us, both in the U.S. and around the world, is how to manage the implosion of American empire in such ways that it harms the fewest people and does the least collateral damage to the environment. To deflate American empire through deliberate devolution will require a process led by publics rather than politicians. And it will require cooperation between a principled left and right in the U.S. as well as active partnerships with democratic nations, movements and institutions worldwide. We can already see these forms of cooperation beginning to occur. And it's our task to use the media in creative new ways to broaden and deepen this cooperation.

    * Realize that resistance to change can actually accelerate change. The morning after Terrible Tuesday, I sat down to conduct an interview on hybrid vehicles with a top Toyota engineer. It was the last thing on my mind as I stewed over the results of the election. But as we discussed the principle behind hybrid technologies it struck me that the elegant simplicity of the concept might offer an intriguing clue as to how to use resistance to forward movement to generate fuel for further progress. The essential mechanism behind hybrid vehicles is a marriage between an internal combustion engine that powers forward movement and an electric motor that also becomes a power generator whenever the vehicle is braking or coasting. In effect, then, the hybrid is able to use any resistance to or slowing of its forward movement to its advantage by transforming what the Toyota engineer calls "free energy" into fuel for the next lap of the journey. If we think of a hybrid vehicle as a social change vehicle, then any opposition or resistance we encounter to our forward movement, once transformed by a hybrid, "both/and" approach, can become an impetus to further social change.

        The first step in transforming this resistant energy is realizing that it is not inherently contrary and that, rightly understood, it contains energy that is essential to further progress. I suggested, and the Toyota engineer agreed, that hybrid technologies are essentially a form of mechanical aikido, harnessing resistance to forward movement to move further forward. Or, in the metaphor of social change, it is harnessing your opponent's attacking energy to take both of you where you want to go. I can't claim to understand just how to achieve this transformation in every instance, but we've already seen that George Bush's ascendancy has brought new energy and clarity to our collective work and has united most of the world in opposition to his policies in ways that, unfortunately, no progressive leader could have done on his or her own.

* Secede and unite. Just before heading for bed on Tuesday evening, I wrote those three words on a post-it note. Having done so, I could then sleep soundly. It seems to me that this simple phrase encapsulates the two-step dance we'll be doing in response to the discordant harmonies of the second Bush term. By "secede," I mean that life-affirming people across the political spectrum, in this country and around the world, need to declare our independence from this illegitimate, death-dealing regime, withdrawing our consent to be governed by it and devising myriad inventive ways of expressing this noncooperation. We need to develop both small steps that can be widely adopted by those who are new to such gestures and large steps for those ready to pay a higher price for their resistance. We should encourage any and all forms of noncooperation that are nonviolent, including those that use humor as a source of satire and ridicule. By using the word "secession," we can harness the potent energy and mythology behind the Southern rebel's fierce, rousing refusal to accept what he saw as illegitimate rule while standing its animating mission on its head (i.e., liberation rather than slavery). Returning to the Declaration of Independence, we can locate a more august tradition in which to vest our secession, declaring our independence from the madness of King George and our withdrawal from a dysfunctional political process.

      It's equally important, however, that in seceding from an obsolete and self-destructive regime, we declare our unity with one another and with all those at home and abroad who embrace a more inclusive, egalitarian, and life-affirming vision for human development. More than that, it's essential that we start to enact that vision in practice by engaging together in a pragmatic problem-solving process that our governments have abandoned in their pursuit of power for its own sake. This means grappling with problems where they occur with whatever tools come to hand and not expecting governments to fix them for us. It also means reaching across longstanding divides to those on the other side of the political spectrum with whom we may share more than we realize. In particular, we need to reach out to those in Middle America whom we have so long dismissed as "flyover" and who, sensing our contempt, dismiss us as elitists. Having grown up in the epicenter of this year's disastrous elections, in the very state and county where Bush's apparent success was "delivered" by Diebold, I know that Middle Americans are better and brighter than their voting habits would indicate. But we'll never discover that better part of them unless and until we approach them with less judgment and greater openness.

* Approach the future with confidence, knowing that we're on the right side of history. This is not the same as saying "God's on our side." If there's a God, he/she probably doesn't choose sides. But the winds of history and evolution do blow in certain directions and if we navigate skillfully we can use their natural flow to take us where we want to go. The greatest impediment to constructive cultural evolution is the fear of change, a visceral anxiety about the unknown and untried. We've all felt it at one time or another; I felt it in the form of dread on Tuesday night as I contemplated another four years of Bush II. We usually think of hope as the antidote to fear, but I've come to feel that hope is a fragile reed on which to base a long-term commitment and not a very compelling approach with which to persuade skeptics. I choose to ground my efforts instead in confidence that, if we move skillfully and forthrightly in the direction of our dreams, we can achieve more than we imagine and far more than we can with hope alone. Hope stands by the water's edge wondering if it's warm enough to jump in. Confidence jumps right in and does what it needs to do to stay afloat and get where it wants to go. Or again, hope is like standing on the edge of a thicket (say, a thicket of thorn Bushes) trying to figure out how to get through it -- and not at all sure it's possible. Confidence is envisioning yourself already on the other side, knowing you've gotten there and looking back to see what it took to get through. I choose to cultivate a fierce joy, a passionate embrace of the struggle, knowing that this is the reason why I'm here on earth and the fulfillment of my being. For all their terror, I'm grateful to live in these times and appreciate that I'm given the opportunity to address challenges of such scale and historic import. No boredom here!

        * Remember that it's darkest before the dawn. Some of you may know Pete Seeger's lovely song, "Quite Early Morning." It begins:

They say it's darkest before the dawn
   This thought it keeps me movin' on
      If we could heed this early warning
     The time is now quite early morning

     Emotionally and spiritually, our darkest hours are late in the night, three to four a.m., during what some have called "The Hour of the Wolf." These are the moments when our bio-rhythms slow and we become most vulnerable to lacerating self-doubt. Tossing in bed like a dinghy in a typhoon, we are exposed to our deepest fears and anxieties. In recent years I've learned to get out of bed at times like this. I fold my legs and meditate, following my breath to bring the terrorizing tempests to ground in the steadying cycles of life. Sometimes I've sat this way till first light. It's comforting to know that these most trying moments are but a prelude to the promise of a new morning. I'm confident that what we're now living through is the break-up of an old order that no longer serves humanity or nature and the breakthrough to a new way that, though far from perfect, will be better suited to the world we will inherit. Our task is to be midwives to the emergence of this new era and to assure that its birth brings more joy than sorrow.

Mark
 
Mark Sommer, Executive Director
The Mainstream Media Project
Host, "A World of Possibilities"
854 9th St.  Suite B
Arcata, CA  95521
PH  707-826-9111, ext. 12
FAX  707-826-9112
msommer@mainstream-media.net
www.mainstream-media.net
www.aworldofpossibilities.com