Sunday, July 24, 2005

Captivity by Carol Wolman

Captivity by Carol Wolman

 
Psalm 126  4Turn again our captivity, O LORD, as the streams in the south.
 
People have come to America from all over the world to find freedom, freedom from oppressive governments of all sorts.  Our Constitution not only guarantees freedom in the Bill of Rights, it also sets up a system that fragments the power of government so that citizens can remain free.  The dispersion of power to the federal, state and local levels, the balance of power among the three branches of government, the bicameral legislatures- all of these are designed to ensure that power is not concentrated in the hands of one or a few, so as not to replicate the monarchies and oligarchies from which immigrants have escaped.
 
But now Americans are enslaved to an oligarchy, perhaps a few thousand people, of very wealthy corporados, who make war illegally, bankrupt the treasury, blacken our international reputation and legislate away our freedom.  We are financially enslaved via credit card debt, mortgages, the need for jobs.  We are morally enslaved by our dependence on the oil and consumer goods which the oligarchy still provides us.  We are spiritually enslaved by our fear of their power, and our reluctance to face the reality of the disaster that has befallen us. 
 
The US Constitution is still in force, last I heard.  It vests ultimate power in
"we the people", not in the president or Congress.  These officials are our elected representatives, or are supposed to be, and the fiction at least is still preserved.  If they commit crimes against us, then we can impeach them, kick them out of office, and try them for their crimes.
 
The only way that our captivity can be turned back into freedom is by deposing the oligarchy.  Impeachment is a good place to start.  The Downing Street memos and Plamegate offer ample grounds for impeachment, or at least enough to warrant a Resolution of Inquiry, whereby the House holds hearings to find out whether impeachment is warranted.
 
We cannot expect the valiant members of the House Progressive Caucus- John Conyers, Barbara Lee, Maxine Waters and some of the others who led After Downing Street forums last Saturday, to take the lead on impeachment.  Barbara Lee made this plain in Oakland when I asked her about it.  They are doing what they can to lay the groundwork, but given the current Republican straitjacket, they are limited.
 
The leadership for impeachment must come from "we the people".  That is why I keep urging you to print out the letter to Conyers, asking him to proceed with a Resolution of Inquiry, at  http://DeepEndNews.com/MEMORANDUM.htm    Fill it up with 15 signatures, and fax it to him.
 
This accomplishes several purposes.  It raises awareness that impeachment is possible, and educates people on the mechanism.  It gets people talking, thinking, energized.  It encourages the Congresspeople who are working on this and emboldens them to continue.  As this letter is disseminated, and as the outrage over the treasonous behavior of Rove, Libby. and their bosses Bush and Cheney mounts, the momentum for impeachment will grow and grow.
 
God is with us, and is opening the doors.  We must do our part, to end our Babylonian captivity and return to the Zion of democracy.
 
In the name of the Prince of Peace,  Carol Wolman
 

Calling a Traitor a Traitor and being done with it. by DonkeyKongLives

UNITED STATES CODE
TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 115 > § 2381
§ 2381. Treason

UNITED STATES CODE
TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 115 > § 2381
§ 2381. Treason

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

 

Calling a Traitor a Traitor and being done with it.

Tue Jul 12th, 2005 at 01:33:31 PDT

In time of war, an American has given the name of a undercover CIA agent of the United States to the media.  An agent of that media Novak has then published that name blowing the cover of one of the CIA's covert front companies and potentially blowing the cover of all who worked there, visited there or previosly worked with those who worked their.  

This is a direct action against the CIA in time of war.  The name of an undercover agent tasked with keeping the worst weapons out of the hands of Bin Laden has been betrayed by a member of the administration of the President of the United States.  Is this Bush, Rove and Novak's idea of a war on terrorism?

As anyone familiar with espionage of any form will tell you any single piece of information that is known to be true will lead to many other pieces of information, hence the legitimiate obsession with secrecy held by all intelligence agencies.  Bin Laden and others who seek to hurt the USA now, thanks to Novak, have a confirmed piece of information regarding the CIA's effort to protect you from real WMDs.

Here is Novak's quote first published in Oct 1, 2003.

"Wilson never worked for the CIA, but his wife, Valerie Plame, is an Agency operative on weapons of mass destruction. Two senior administration officials told me Wilson's wife suggested sending him to Niger to investigate the Italian report. The CIA says its counter-proliferation officials selected Wilson and asked his wife to contact him. "I will not answer any question about my wife," Wilson told me."

Am I the only one who believes Novak is a traitor?  Am I the only one who thinks delivering an undercover agent's identity to the enemies of America is a crime?  Because intentionally or unintentionally that is exactly what Novak did, I personally lean towards it being intentional as I am pretty sure he knew a lot of people read his column.

Am I the only one who realizes that delivering the identity of one person delivers the identities of all the people they work with and allows the enemies of America to discover still move undercover members of the CIA?  Is it Novak's belief that none of  Plume's co-workers at the CIA do anything secret?  

Am I the only one who realizes that Novak is not in jail because he didn't keep the CIA's secret while Judith Miller is in jail because she did keep the CIA's secret.  Am I the only one who believes Karl Rove who started this mess according to Matthew Cooper's testimony should be the one in jail?  Am I also the only who believes that common knowledge among journalists or not giving the name of a covert agent of the CIA to the enemies of America is still treason and as such Novak too belongs in jail?

Unless George Bush Jr. acts to stop the traitors in his mist I believe a serious effort to impeach is in order under the treason portion of Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution,

"The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors."

Fw: [peacemakersBiblestudy] ..torture of children at Abu Ghraib

 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, July 23, 2005 11:50 PM
Subject: [peacemakersBiblestudy] ...the new photos and video of abuse at Abu Ghraib prison include the torture of children. http://tinyurl.com/32lhk http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/7/23/15839/3683

From: LADYWINDSOR1@AOL.COM More on the Abu Gharib sex abuse from RAW 
STORY
http://tinyurl.com/32lhk

Apparently all the world  knows except us.
By _~A!_ (
http://watchingthewatchers.org/user/~A!) , Section _News_
(
http://watchingthewatchers.org/section/news)
Posted on Sat Jul 23, 2005 at 12:13:27 PM EST
Data is emerging, no matter how the administration attempts to hide 
it,  that
the new photos and video of abuse at Abu Ghraib prison include the 
torture
of children.
Norway's Prime Minister's office says it plans to address  the 
situation with
the U.S. "in a very severe and direct  way."
Could this mean losing yet another ally in the Iraq occupation? Amnesty
International in Norway has said that Norway can no longer continue 
their
occupation of Iraq, or their support of US policy in this matter.
And some countries, as _Tom  Tomorrow notes_
(
http://www.thismodernworld.com/weblog/mtarchives/
week_2004_07_04.html) , actually listen to their activists.
While there isn't even an inkling of this in the US Mainstream media, 
all
over the world people are beginning to read about the US abusing 
children at Abu Ghraib.
_Der  Spiegel_
(
http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http://www.spiegel.de/
politik/ausland/0,1518,druck-307200,00.html&langpair=de|
en&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&newwindow=1&safe=off&c2coff=1&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&prev=/
language_tools)
http://tinyurl.com/8hlom
The _Sunday Herald_ (http://sundayherald.com/)  in  Scotland has a 
piece on
the abuse of children at the notorious prison:
From _Iraq's Child Prisoners_ (
http://www.sundayherald.com/43796) ,  
written
one year ago:
It was early last October that Kasim Mehaddi Hilas says he  witnessed 
the
rape of a boy prisoner aged about 15 in the notorious Abu Ghraib  
prison in Iraq.
"The kid was hurting very bad and they covered all the doors  with 
sheets,"
he said in a statement given to investigators probing prisoner  abuse 
in Abu
Ghraib. "Then, when I heard the screaming I climbed the door ...  and 
I saw [the
soldier´s name is deleted] who was wearing a military uniform."  
Hilas, who
was himself threatened with being sexually assaulted in Abu Graib,  then
describes in horrific detail how the soldier raped "the little kid".
A _DailyKos  diarist_ (
http://www.dailykos.com/story/
2005/7/23/15839/3683)
has artist renditions of the abuse of a little girl being shown in  
magazines
across the world. Here are a few:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/7/23/15839/3683

Reports put a rough estimate of children in Abu Ghraib at 107. 
Remember that
70-90% of the people at Abu Ghraib were found to be innocent, and it
translates  into many innocent children being held to suffer for 
nothing.
The world is reading this, Norway is thinking of pulling out over it, 
and no
one here knows anything about it. The media will ignore this story as 
long as
  they can, and it explains why President Bush does not want the new 
photos
released.
Could it be that child abuse would turn even his staunchest supporters
against him? Nevermind the abhorrence of such a thing on its very face.
I will close here with a quote from the man that Bush claims to live 
his life
  in homage to, Jesus of Nazareth:
And whosoever shall offend one of [these] little ones that believe  
in me, it
is better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and  
he were
cast into the sea
http://watchingthewatchers.org/story/2005/7/23/121327/078






YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

 
 Visit your group "peacemakersBiblestudy" on the web.
 
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 
peacemakersBiblestudy-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.