Wednesday, October 12, 2005

The Confusors by Carol Wolman

The Confusors by Carol Wolman

Why did Bush pick Harriet Miers for the Supreme Court?  Is it because she covered his ass on the issue of his being AWOL during Vietnam during his election campaigns?  Is it because she took care of the Texas gaming commission for him?  Is he hoping she will protect him from impeachment?

Breaking News from ABCNEWS.com:

BUSH: RELIGIOUS BELIEFS OF HARRIET MIERS ARE PART OF THE REASON HE PICKED HER FOR SUPREME COURT
http://www.firedupamerica.com/trackback/226
 
James Dobson has been twisting the arms of senators to convince them that Miers is God's choice.  Pat Robertson is threatening senators who oppose her with fire and brimstone.  Christopher Hitchens calls it "Theological Blackmail".  http://www.slate.com/id/2127821/
 
This is a most egregious example of the confusion that the socalled Christian Right has sown in America over the past 35 years.  By their self-serving distortion of the Bible and the teachings of Jesus, they have alienated many Americans from true Christianity.  By their lying representation of the message of the Prince of Peace, they have made us forget what truth is.  As He put it:
 
Luke 11: 52"Woe to you, scholars of the law!
You have taken away the key of knowledge.
You yourselves did not enter and you stopped those trying to enter.”
 
The disasters of the past few months, especially Iraq and the hurricanes, and the threats of disasters to come, are awakening America to the hypocrisy of Bush's "faith" and those of his minions.  Americans are rediscovering the meaning of words like "truth", "justice", "love".
 
The God of the Bible is the God of all people on planet earth, whether His/Her name be Jehovah, Allah, Jesus, Brahma, Wakan Tanka.  The God of humans stands for peace, love, truth and justice.  This God will empower anyone who seeks to serve Him/Her, and give us strength to tell the truth, strip the imposters of their sheeps' clothing, and bring them to justice. (see The Way of Holiness by Robert Mendelson at www.armageddonoftheego.com)
 
In the name of the Prince of Peace,  Carol Wolman

Fw: [ImpeachBushNOW] The conservative crack up

Looks like the Bush base is falling apart.  
----- Original Message -----
From: NT
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 4:58 PM
Subject: [ImpeachBushNOW] The conservative crack up

The conservative crack up
The neocons develop an exit strategy — a political one

By Howard Fineman
MSNBC contributor
Updated: 12:46 p.m. ET Oct. 12, 2005

WASHINGTON - President George W. Bush may have no military exit strategy for Iraq, but the “neocons” who convinced him to go to war there have developed one of their own — a political one: Blame the Administration.

Their neo-Wilsonian theory is correct, they insist, but the execution was botched by a Bush team that has turned out to be incompetent, crony-filled, corrupt, unimaginative and weak over a wide range of issues.

The flight of the neocons — just read a recent Weekly Standard to see what I am talking about — is one of only many indications that the long-predicted “conservative crackup” is at hand.

 

The “movement” – that began 50 years ago with the founding of Bill Buckley’s National Review; that had its coming of age in the Reagan Years; that reached its zenith with Bush’s victory in 2000 — is falling apart at the seams.

In 1973, Karl Rove met George W. Bush, and became the R2D2 and Luke Skywalker of Republican politics. At first, neither was plugged into “The Force” — the conservative movement. But over the years they learned how to use its power.

By the time Bush was in his second term as governor, laying the groundwork for his presidential run, he and Rove had gathered all of the often competing and sometimes contradictory strains of conservatism into one light beam. You could tell by the people they brought to Austin.

To tie down the religious conservatives, they nudged John Ashcroft out of the race and conducted a literal laying on of hands at the governor’s mansion with leaders such as James Dobson.

For the libertarian anti-tax crowd, they brought in certified supply-sider Larry Lindsey as the top economic advisor.

For the traditional war hawks they brought in Paul Wolfowitz, among others, to get Bush up to speed on the world.

For the traditional corporate types – well, Bush had that taken care of on his own.

 

But now all the constituent parts are — for various reasons — going their own way. Here's a checklist:

Religious conservatives
The Harriet Miers nomination was the final insult. Religious conservatives have an inferiority complex in the Republican Party. In an interesting way, it’s the same attitude that many African-Americans have had toward the Democratic Party over the years. They think that the Big Boys want their votes but not their presence or their full participation.

And what really frosts the religious types is that Bush evidently feels that he can only satisfy them by stealth — by nominating someone with absolutely no paper trail. It’s an affront.  And even though Dr. Dobson is on board — having been cajoled aboard by Rove — I don’t sense that there is much enthusiasm for the enterprise out in Colorado Springs.

I expect that any GOP 2008 hopeful who wants evangelical support — people like Sam Brownback, Rick Santorum  and maybe even George Allen — will vote against Miers's confirmation in the Senate.

 

Corporate CEOs
For them, Bush’s handling of Katrina was, and remains, a mortal embarrassment to their class, which Bush is supposed to have represented — at least to some extent.

These are people who believe in the Faith of Management — in anticipating problems and moving mass organizations. They also like to think of themselves as having a social conscience. And even if they don’t, they are sensitive to world opinion.

The vivid images from the Superdome were just too much for these folks. Recently, a prominent Republican businessman, whom I saw in a typical CEO haunt, astonished me with the severity of his attacks on Bush’s competence. And Bush had appointed this guy to a major position! Amazing.

 

Main Street: Smaller government deficit hawks
This is an old-fashioned but important core of conservatism: people who think federal spending should be relentlessly reduced, and that we should always view with suspicion any proposals to increase the role of the federal government in local and private life.

After binges of spending and legislating, backbenchers in the GOP, especially in the House, are in open revolt, having gathered around Rep. Mike Pence of Indiana and Sen. John McCain in the Senate. They tend to view the “Leadership’s” spending habits with alarm.

 

Isolationists
An old term, but still applicable. With the fall of Communism in Europe and Russia, the old anti-Communist wing of the conservative movement lost its role. Now the isolationists of old are back, and with a new crusade: immigration.

The relatively unchecked flood of illegal immigrants into this country is indeed a legitimate cause for alarm. But in the eyes of this crowd — one leader is my MSNBC colleague, Pat Buchanan — the Bush Administration is doing nothing.

 

Neocons
They think that the Middle East can be remade, and this country made safe, by instilling a semblance of democracy in the Fertile Crescent and beyond. But they seem to have given up on the ability of the Bush Administration to see that vision through.

They want more troops, not fewer; more money, not less; more passion, not the whispered talk of timetables for withdrawal.

Besides championing democracy, we need to show strength and resolve, they believe — and they are no longer convinced that Bush can show much of either.

 

Supply-siders
This is the one faction that the president has yet to disappoint in a major way. He pushed through two major tax cuts, and is pushing more — targeted ones — in the wake of Katrina.

 

Deep in their collective memory bank, Bush and Rove remember what happened when Daddy moved his lips and raised taxes. But now that the son has been reelected, will he move his lips, too? If the conservative crack up is to be complete — and I think it will be — the answer is yes.

 

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9651882/



"Repetition does not transform a lie into a truth." - F.D.R.

 
 
 


Yahoo! Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try it free.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ImpeachBushNOW




YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Fw: [Peacemakers_Bible_Study_2] IGovernment by Temper Tantrum by Doug Thompson


----- Original Message -----
From: "Gerry D" <belladonnamia5402@sbcglobal.net>
To: <Peacemakers_Bible_Study_2@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 7:41 AM
Subject: [Peacemakers_Bible_Study_2] It's getting scarier...

http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_7509.shtml
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------

Government by Temper Tantrum
By DOUG THOMPSON
Oct 11, 2005, 06:53
Email this article
Printer friendly page

President George W. Bush's temper tantrums are on the rise with White
House insiders reporting increasing tongue-lashing of staffers,
obscenity-filled outbursts and a leader driven to the edge by what he
sees as party disloyalty and a country that no longer trusts him.

Conservative backlash over his latest Supreme Court nominee may, in
fact, have pushed the President over the edge.

"He's out of control," one White House aide says privately. "There's
no other way to put it. His anger spills over in meetings. He berates
anyone who brings him bad news but there's not a lot of good news we
can bring the President right now. He calls other
Republicans 'motherfucking traitors' and it is becoming more and more
of a challenge to keep that anger from showing in public."

A Bush White House that has always prided itself with an ability to
shield the President's weaknesses from the public faces a mounting
list of embarrassing public incidents.

The most recent came when Bush fled Washington to avoid the largest
anti-war rally since Vietnam, some reporters asked him if he was
running away.

"No goddamn it," he snapped back. "I'm going to keep track of
Hurricane relief." Then he flew out of town to a command center in
Colorado to watch what was happening in New Orleans, something he
could easily monitored from the situation room of The White House.
Reporters present said Bush shoved his way past aides to get away
from more questions.

"Bush was happy to get out of town and track Hurricane Rita last
weekend as a way of displaying his new-found interest in the
suffering of hundreds of thousands of people in the Gulf area," wrote
Helen Thomas of Hearst Newspapers. "He flew to Austin, Texas, and
spent the night in San Antonio. He traveled to a command center in
Colorado, where he was able to monitor Hurricane Rita while an
estimated 100,000 to 300,000 Americans converged on Washington and
peacefully demonstrated against the Iraq war. Their protest included
a march in front of the White House."

The mainstreamers have long joked about Bush's temper tantrums but
have only recently started writing about them.

"There's a doctoral dissertation to be written about Bush appointees
named during the administration's frequent fits of Petulant Pique,"
Molly Ivins writes. "These PP appointments are made in the immortal
childhood spirit of "nanny-nanny boo-boo, I'll show you."

In Time Magazine this past weekend, Joe Klein asks "Turf wars, temper
tantrums, mysterious leaks-has Bush lost control of his own
government?"

"The President's rut reflects a gathering dysfunction in his
Administration," Klein continues. "The White House seems paralyzed."

But is this something new? Consider this from Andrew Stephans of The
Observer in London:

"The 43rd US President has always had a much-publicized knack for
mangled syntax, but now George Bush often searches an agonizingly
long time, sometimes in vain, for the right words. His mind simply
blanks out at crucial times. He is prone, I am told, to foul-mouthed
temper tantrums in the White House. His handlers now rarely allow him
to speak an unscripted word in public."

Stephans wrote that analysis on October 17, 2004, two weeks before
last year's election. In the same article he reported:

"A senior Republican, experienced and wise in the ways of Washington,
told me last Friday that he does not necessarily accept that Bush is
unstable, but what is clear, he added, is that he is now manifestly
unfit to be President."

That was nearly year ago. Since then the situation has only gotten
worse.

© Copyright 2005 by Capitol Hill Blue

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Click here to rescue a little child from a life of poverty.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/rAWabB/gYnLAA/i1hLAA/TM0rlB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Peacemakers_Bible_Study_2/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Peacemakers_Bible_Study_2-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/