Saturday, July 02, 2005

Fw: Supreme Court destroys property rights

Hey, Everyone!
Here is the action page to sell David Souter's home to a hotel developer! Souter, Souter, who's David Souter? Oh, he's one of the five Supreme Court Justices who destroyed your property rights! He thought this law was a good idea... Sooooo... Scroll down just a bit and click on the "Go" in the 'take action now' square...

RightMarch.com
Patriotism In Action.






FREE Email Alerts!
Your Name:
Email Address:


(Privacy Policy)

Action Alerts

Donate

News

Links

Store

Subscribe

Contact Us









Home . Elected Officials . Issues . Election . Media


Legislative Alerts and Updates . Current Legislation . Key Votes . Capitol Hill Basics

Action Alert

Punish Souter for Property Theft decision
Help see that "Justice Is Served" on Property Rights!







ALERT: Are you as OUTRAGED as we are about the Supreme Court's recent decision, allowing city governments to take land from one private owner and give it to another? In "Kelo vs. City of New London", five Justices (led by David Souter) ruled that "eminent domain" allows any local government to TAKE anyone's private property if the government will generate greater tax revenue -- or any other economic benefits -- when the land is developed by the new owner.

If you AREN'T outraged, then you're not paying attention!

These black-robed dictators have now virtually destroyed individual property rights in the United States. Ignoring the U.S. Constitution AGAIN, the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that local governments have the "right" to seize private property to make way for private commercial development such as shopping malls.

You read that right. It doesn't matter if your family has lived in your home since you were 11 years old -- if the local government decides that they could make more tax dollars by putting in a mall, too bad for you and your family.

Even Justice Sandra Day O'Connor said in her dissent to the ruling, "Nothing is to prevent the State from replacing any Motel 6 with a Ritz-Carlton, any home with a shopping mall, or any farm with a factory."

But, the Supreme Court has spoken, so that's the end of it, right? Nothing can be done to expose this ruling for the TRAVESTY it really is, right?

WRONG. As a matter of fact, there IS something that can be done -- we can take this ruling to its logical conclusion, and show Justice Souter and his ilk who are sitting there in their ivory towers, far removed from us "common" folk, just what their "legal theories" are doing to US.

So, in keeping with what has now been deemed "constitutional", a private developer has contacted the local government in Supreme Court Justice David Souter's hometown in New Hampshire, asking that the property of the judge be seized to make room for a new hotel.

According to WorldNetDaily.com, Logan Darrow Clements faxed a request to the town of Weare, N.H., seeking to start the application process to build a hotel on 34 Cilley Hill Road, the present location of Souter's home.

Wrote Clements: "Although this property is owned by an individual, David H. Souter, a recent Supreme Court decision, Kelo v. City of New London, clears the way for this land to be taken by the government of Weare through eminent domain and given to my LLC for the purposes of building a hotel. The justification for such an eminent domain action is that our hotel will better serve the public interest as it will bring in economic development and higher tax revenue to Weare."

Ah, poetic justice is served. And YOU can help serve it to Justice Souter.

TAKE ACTION: This is not a prank. The town of Weare has five people on the Board of Selectmen. If three of them vote to use the power of eminent domain to take this land from Mr. Souter, Mr. Clements can begin his hotel development -- and we can begin the process of reversing this travesty of justice. He already plans to raise investment capital from wealthy pro-liberty investors and draw up architectural plans. These plans would then be used to raise additional capital for the project.

FINALLY, these tyrants in black can "face the music" and actually EXPERIENCE what they're putting the rest of us through! Click "Go!" above NOW to send a message to all five members of the town of Weare's Board of Selectmen at once, asking them to see that "Justice Is Served" by implementing Souter's decision and putting a hotel on HIS property.

NOTE: Yes, like Clements, we're aware of the apparent conflict of someone who is strongly opposed to the Kelo decision using it to purposely oust an American from his property. "I realize there is a contradiction, but we're only going to use it against people who advocated" the Kelo decision, Clements told WorldNet Daily. "Therefore, it's a case of retaliation, not initiation."

Be sure to send this Alert to EVERYONE you know who wants to help see that "Justice Is Served" in this outrageous decision to destroy private property rights! Thank you!




LET'S STOP KIDDING OURSELVES! 9-11 was an Israeli-backed spanking on our
collective American bottom! A Boeing 757 DIDN'T pierce through six walls of the
Pentagon (impossible + no aircraft debris), a late model cruise missile did the job;
the Twin Towers DIDN'T collapse due to heat (impossible), demolition charges
did the job; there were NO Arab hijackers (the jets were guided electronically);
and the Zionists/Judeo-Christians now in control of the United States are traitors
to the U.S. Constitution... as well as being mass murderers.This has been a Zionist
WAG THE DOG operation from the start, deadly serious for our elected leaders
WHO KNOW WHO'S GUILTY, and an Arabian Nights charade for Mom and Pop
in Littletown, U.S.A.! It's an info war! Forward this to the world! henrithecelt@gci.net

Hey, Everyone!
Here is the action page to sell David Souter's home to a hotel developer! Souter, Souter, who's David Souter? Oh, he's one of the five Supreme Court Justices who destroyed your property rights! He thought this law was a good idea... Sooooo... Scroll down just a bit and click on the "Go" in the 'take action now' square...
 
RightMarch.com
         Patriotism In Action.

Home About Us Join Donate PAC
FREE Email Alerts!
Your Name:
Email Address:


(Privacy Policy)
Action Alerts
Donate
News
Links
Store
Subscribe
Contact Us
Register to Vote

Home  �  Elected Officials  �  Issues  �  Election  �  Media
Legislative Alerts and Updates Current Legislation Key Votes Capitol Hill Basics
Action Alert
Take Action Punish Souter for Property Theft decision
Help see that "Justice Is Served" on Property Rights!
 
ALERT: Are you as OUTRAGED as we are about the Supreme Court's recent decision, allowing city governments to take land from one private owner and give it to another? In "Kelo vs. City of New London", five Justices (led by David Souter) ruled that "eminent domain" allows any local government to TAKE anyone's private property if the government will generate greater tax revenue -- or any other economic benefits -- when the land is developed by the new owner.

If you AREN'T outraged, then you're not paying attention!

These black-robed dictators have now virtually destroyed individual property rights in the United States. Ignoring the U.S. Constitution AGAIN, the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that local governments have the "right" to seize private property to make way for private commercial development such as shopping malls.

You read that right. It doesn't matter if your family has lived in your home since you were 11 years old -- if the local government decides that they could make more tax dollars by putting in a mall, too bad for you and your family.

Even Justice Sandra Day O'Connor said in her dissent to the ruling, "Nothing is to prevent the State from replacing any Motel 6 with a Ritz-Carlton, any home with a shopping mall, or any farm with a factory."

But, the Supreme Court has spoken, so that's the end of it, right? Nothing can be done to expose this ruling for the TRAVESTY it really is, right?

WRONG. As a matter of fact, there IS something that can be done -- we can take this ruling to its logical conclusion, and show Justice Souter and his ilk who are sitting there in their ivory towers, far removed from us "common" folk, just what their "legal theories" are doing to US.

So, in keeping with what has now been deemed "constitutional", a private developer has contacted the local government in Supreme Court Justice David Souter's hometown in New Hampshire, asking that the property of the judge be seized to make room for a new hotel.

According to WorldNetDaily.com, Logan Darrow Clements faxed a request to the town of Weare, N.H., seeking to start the application process to build a hotel on 34 Cilley Hill Road, the present location of Souter's home.

Wrote Clements: "Although this property is owned by an individual, David H. Souter, a recent Supreme Court decision, Kelo v. City of New London, clears the way for this land to be taken by the government of Weare through eminent domain and given to my LLC for the purposes of building a hotel. The justification for such an eminent domain action is that our hotel will better serve the public interest as it will bring in economic development and higher tax revenue to Weare."

Ah, poetic justice is served. And YOU can help serve it to Justice Souter.

TAKE ACTION:
This is not a prank. The town of Weare has five people on the Board of Selectmen. If three of them vote to use the power of eminent domain to take this land from Mr. Souter, Mr. Clements can begin his hotel development -- and we can begin the process of reversing this travesty of justice. He already plans to raise investment capital from wealthy pro-liberty investors and draw up architectural plans. These plans would then be used to raise additional capital for the project.

FINALLY, these tyrants in black can "face the music" and actually EXPERIENCE what they're putting the rest of us through! Click "Go!" above NOW to send a message to all five members of the town of Weare's Board of Selectmen at once, asking them to see that "Justice Is Served" by implementing Souter's decision and putting a hotel on HIS property.

NOTE: Yes, like Clements, we're aware of the apparent conflict of someone who is strongly opposed to the Kelo decision using it to purposely oust an American from his property. "I realize there is a contradiction, but we're only going to use it against people who advocated" the Kelo decision, Clements told WorldNet Daily. "Therefore, it's a case of retaliation, not initiation."

Be sure to send this Alert to EVERYONE you know who wants to help see that "Justice Is Served" in this outrageous decision to destroy private property rights! Thank you!







LET'S STOP KIDDING OURSELVES!  9-11 was an Israeli-backed spanking on our
collective American bottom! A Boeing 757 DIDN'T pierce through six walls of the
Pentagon (impossible + no aircraft debris), a late model cruise missile did the job;
the Twin Towers DIDN'T collapse due to heat (impossible), demolition charges
did the job;  there were NO Arab hijackers (the jets were guided electronically);
and the Zionists/Judeo-Christians now in control of the United States are traitors
to the U.S. Constitution... as well as being mass murderers.This has been a Zionist
WAG THE DOG operation from the start, deadly serious for our elected leaders
WHO KNOW WHO'S GUILTY, and an Arabian Nights charade for Mom and Pop
in Littletown, U.S.A.! It's an info war! Forward this to the world! henrithecelt@gci.net
 
 
 



----- Forwarded message from Henri the Celt <henrithecelt@gci.net> -----
    Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 10:31:35 -0800
    From: Henri the Celt <henrithecelt@gci.net>

 Subject: Hey, I sent in mine!...
    
Hey, Everyone!
Here is the action page to sell David Souter's home to a hotel developer!
Souter, Souter, who's David Souter? Oh, he's one of the five Supreme Court
Justices who destroyed your property rights! He thought this law was a good
idea... Sooooo... Scroll down just a bit and click on the "Go" in the 'take
action now' square...

           RightMarch.com
                     Patriotism In Action.

          
    
                     
    
           
                  FREE Email Alerts!
                  Your Name:
                      Email Address:

                  
                  (Privacy Policy) 
                
                  Action Alerts 
                
                  Donate 
                
                  News 
                
                  Links 
                
                  Store 
                
                  Subscribe 
                
                  Contact Us            
                   
                             
                            
                      
                
                
              
             
  Home  .  Elected Officials  .  Issues  .  Election  .  Media
                            
                      
                              Legislative Alerts and Updates . Current
Legislation . Key Votes . Capitol Hill Basics
                      
                              Action Alert
                            
                                  Punish Souter for Property Theft decision
                      Help see that "Justice Is Served" on Property Rights!
                                                           
                                  
                                 
                                
                                                                 
                                ALERT: Are you as OUTRAGED as we are about the
Supreme Court's recent decision, allowing city governments to take land from one
private owner and give it to another? In "Kelo vs. City of New London", five
Justices (led by David Souter) ruled that "eminent domain" allows any local
government to TAKE anyone's private property if the government will generate
greater tax revenue -- or any other economic benefits -- when the land is
developed by the new owner.

                    If you AREN'T outraged, then you're not paying attention!

                                These black-robed dictators have now virtually
destroyed individual property rights in the United States. Ignoring the U.S.
Constitution AGAIN, the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that local governments have the
"right" to seize private property to make way for private commercial development
such as shopping malls.

                                You read that right. It doesn't matter if your
family has lived in your home since you were 11 years old -- if the local
government decides that they could make more tax dollars by putting in a mall,
too bad for you and your family.

                                Even Justice Sandra Day O'Connor said in her
dissent to the ruling, "Nothing is to prevent the State from replacing any Motel
6 with a Ritz-Carlton, any home with a shopping mall, or any farm with a factory."

                                But, the Supreme Court has spoken, so that's the
end of it, right? Nothing can be done to expose this ruling for the TRAVESTY it
really is, right?

                                WRONG. As a matter of fact, there IS something
that can be done -- we can take this ruling to its logical conclusion, and show
Justice Souter and his ilk who are sitting there in their ivory towers, far
removed from us "common" folk, just what their "legal theories" are doing to US.

                                So, in keeping with what has now been deemed
"constitutional", a private developer has contacted the local government in
Supreme Court Justice David Souter's hometown in New Hampshire, asking that the
property of the judge be seized to make room for a new hotel.

                                According to WorldNetDaily.com, Logan Darrow
Clements faxed a request to the town of Weare, N.H., seeking to start the
application process to build a hotel on 34 Cilley Hill Road, the present
location of Souter's home.

                                Wrote Clements: "Although this property is owned
by an individual, David H. Souter, a recent Supreme Court decision, Kelo v. City
of New London, clears the way for this land to be taken by the government of
Weare through eminent domain and given to my LLC for the purposes of building a
hotel. The justification for such an eminent domain action is that our hotel
will better serve the public interest as it will bring in economic development
and higher tax revenue to Weare."

   Ah, poetic justice is served. And YOU can help serve it to Justice Souter.

                                TAKE ACTION: This is not a prank. The town of
Weare has five people on the Board of Selectmen. If three of them vote to use
the power of eminent domain to take this land from Mr. Souter, Mr. Clements can
begin his hotel development -- and we can begin the process of reversing this
travesty of justice. He already plans to raise investment capital from wealthy
pro-liberty investors and draw up architectural plans. These plans would then be
used to raise additional capital for the project.

                                FINALLY, these tyrants in black can "face the
music" and actually EXPERIENCE what they're putting the rest of us through!
Click "Go!" above NOW to send a message to all five members of the town of
Weare's Board of Selectmen at once, asking them to see that "Justice Is Served"
by implementing Souter's decision and putting a hotel on HIS property.

                                NOTE: Yes, like Clements, we're aware of the
apparent conflict of someone who is strongly opposed to the Kelo decision using
it to purposely oust an American from his property. "I realize there is a
contradiction, but we're only going to use it against people who advocated" the
Kelo decision, Clements told WorldNet Daily. "Therefore, it's a case of
retaliation, not initiation."

                                Be sure to send this Alert to EVERYONE you know
who wants to help see that "Justice Is Served" in this outrageous decision to
destroy private property rights! Thank you!
                                
                            
                                         
           
    

LET'S STOP KIDDING OURSELVES!  9-11 was an Israeli-backed spanking on our
collective American bottom! A Boeing 757 DIDN'T pierce through six walls of the
Pentagon (impossible + no aircraft debris), a late model cruise missile did the
job;
the Twin Towers DIDN'T collapse due to heat (impossible), demolition charges
did the job;  there were NO Arab hijackers (the jets were guided electronically);
and the Zionists/Judeo-Christians now in control of the United States are traitors
to the U.S. Constitution... as well as being mass murderers.This has been a Zionist
WAG THE DOG operation from the start, deadly serious for our elected leaders
WHO KNOW WHO'S GUILTY, and an Arabian Nights charade for Mom and Pop
in Littletown, U.S.A.! It's an info war! Forward this to the world!
henrithecelt@gci.net


----- End forwarded message -----



0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home